NOT GUILTY!
She seems rather weak in the sciences of biology and psychology/s
16 is age of consent.
FWIW, there was a posting on FReerepublic yesterday about some MALE teacher who was sentenced to something like 105 (one hundred and five) years for sex with a teenage girl(s) student.
Seems fair, eh?
p.s. couldn’t find the article via FR search ;-)
"..The age of consent in Texas is 17 (Texas Penal Code Section 21.11). However , "...It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the actor...was not more than three years older than the victim and of the opposite sex...(and) did not use duress, force, or a threat against the victim at the time of the offence" and is not a registered sex offender Section 21.11 (b).
Section 21.12 further prohibits all sexual contact between an employee of a school (including educators) and a student enrolled at the primary or secondary school where said employee works (unless the student is the employee's spouse). No age is specified by the statute (thus, even if the student has reached consent age of 17, it is still a violation), and violations are a second degree felony..."
Looks like she is over the line on at least two legal grounds.
Jenny I got your number
I need to make you mine
Jenny don’t change your number
867-5309.
The sicko’s are running the schools these days.
The exaggerated outrage over episodes like this is silly.
It took until Riojas became pregnant for the student to come forward, the court documents reveal, because he feared he was the father of her child. She claimed that the father was a new boyfriend she began dating following her divorce, who is referred to as Paul in the court documents.
The allegedly tawdry teacher resigned from her job at the school in October, telling the district she was pregnant and couldn’t handle the stress of the investigation.
Last week, she was charged with three counts of sexual assault of a child.
If the HS kid is the father, then she just sentenced him to 18 years of child support payments. He may not have money to pay now, but he might have a good paying job someday, the payments will be retroactive.
Step right up and don’t be shy
Because you will not believe your eyes
She’s right here, behind the glass
You’re gonna like her
‘Cause she’s got class
You can look inside another world
You get to talk to a pretty girl
She’s everything you dream about
(But don’t fall in love)
She’s a beauty
(She’s one in a million girl)
She’s a beauty
(Why would I lie)
Why would I lie
You can say anything you like
But you can’t touch the merchandise
She’ll give you ev’ry penny’s worth
But it will cost you a dollar first
You can step outside your little world
(Step outside)
You can talk to a pretty girl
She’s everything you dream about
(But don’t fall in love)
She’s a beauty
(She’s one in a million girl)
One in a million girl
(Why would I lie)
Why would I lie
(But don’t fall in love)
If you do you’ll find out
She don’t love you
(She’s one in a million girl)
One in a million girl
(Why would I lie)
Now why would I lie
[Instrumental Interlude]
(Step outside your world)
(But don’t fall in love)
She’s a beauty
(She’s one in a million girl)
One in a million girl
(Why would I lie)
Now why would I lie
(But don’t fall in love)
If you do you’ll find out
She don’t love you
(She’s one in a million girl)
One in a million girl
(Why would I lie)
Why would I lie
(But don’t fall in love)
(She’s one in a million girl)
(Why would I lie)
I understand the drooling over this one, however (of whom I just learned from the above link); not to exaggerate but this is -- or was -- potentially a face for the movies, and I can't get it out of my head. (The photo, incidentally, is a mug shot from a prior drunk-driving arrest.) I doubt though that she could act, except perhaps in bed. And in several other photos she isn't that good looking. It's a moot point, anyway. I will say given their comments some of the above posters may not have too much on the ball themselves. For what it's worth here's a slightly bigger reproduction.