Rather convenient for the Supremes to have the option of not commenting, don’t you think? I wish I didn’t have to explain the reasons for my decisions to my bosses at work.
The Supreme Court sometimes does list their reasons for denying cert but since they now routinely receive 8,400 petitions a year and they only grant cert (agree to hear) in about one percent of them, they rarely list their reasons.
The Constitution is the boss.
At least in the country I’ve known and loved, which is no more.
This was totally predictable. Does signal to me, though, that the reason for SCOTUS “evading” the issue wasn’t in order to have Republicans in control of Congress before deciding the issue. That pretty much leaves the Soros economic threats as the probable reason for evading it, which also explains the military, Congress, Hawaii DOH, federal and state law enforcement systems, and media evading it as well.
It’s a coup. Obama is the puppet of the Soros communist-Islamist cabal. Just watch and see if that doesn’t explain everything you observe.
On the contrary, WE are the boss. Our taxes are paying them.
You might look at it this way: the Supreme Court Justices are the “bosses” of the American judiciary. Does your boss need to explain all of his or her actions to you?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he is a stakeholder, yeah...potentially. It it's a publicly traded company, they generally need to explain their actions to a variety of stakeholders.
