[Lurking Libertarian]

And, I might add, Lamberth totally blew off Judge Carter’s statements that Taitz’ case would properly be heard as a Quo Warranto in the DC Circuit.

Carter never said that. He said that he had no jurisdiction to hear a quo warranto claim, because quo warranto claims can only be heard in D.C. He never said that Taitz's quo warranto claim was a proper one or that it would survive a motion to dismiss in D.C.

[butterdezillion]

On what legal ground was it dismissed?