Ping
Don’t have to think about it. I’d rather have salmonella than cancer thanks.
marking for later
What I find intriguing about this is that on the crevo threads, the non-creationist side has asked what purpose there might be for disease like this that can kill us. Why God would have created something like that.
Creationists have explained that there IS a purpose for everything and that what we see now has been corrupted by the Fall and is no longer serving its intended purpose, but rather has become harmful to humans.
This could be one of those situations.
***disclaimer - no intent to start a crevo flame war....
A new twist on one of the oldest treatments...Coley’s Toxin..
http://www.mentalindigestion.net/?p=1133...
> “This research could lead to that holy grail of modern medicine: a cure for cancer.”
.
That line would at least be laughable were it not for the medical establishment’s maniacal attempts to outlaw the many powerful and successful cancer cures that are out there, that they refuse to allow, lest their bottom line be reduced.
.
This is actually NOT a new idea. In the early 1900s, one treatment for syphillis was infection with malaria. The fever was supposed to kill the syphillitic infection, and then malaria could be treated with quinine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syphilis
Check under 6.4