Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Norman Bates

No, it’s demonstrably wrong that it’s an impediment.


24 posted on 11/23/2010 10:33:39 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
You think resigning the office of the executive of a small state government in mid-term and plopping right onto the million-dollar book-and-speech circuit is an asset? You keep dreaming.

And no it's not "demonstrably wrong." It's an opinion - based firmly in fact (she did resign); and a legitimate one at that.

34 posted on 11/23/2010 10:40:28 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger

I have to disagree with you on that. I don’t care for a quitter. Yes, she did it for the money, there is nothing wrong with that, but she most certainly didn’t have any altruistic reasons for leaving the gov.s office. I would prefer some one with a little more experience running the show. I think we can all see that st style over substance isn’t working for us now.


257 posted on 11/24/2010 3:05:52 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson