Posted on 11/20/2010 1:01:52 PM PST by Retired Intelligence Officer
Not like she can’t afford it. Or do you propose the taxpayers provide security for a private citizen?
It’ll be a miracle if a demented leftard (a redundancy, I realize)doesn’t attempt to assassinate her. (Physically, that is-they’ve been attempting other means for 2+ years)
Are you proposing the taxpayers pick up the tab?
I'm as outspoken as Sarah, should I get a secret service detail?
It’s the media’s fault. Some guy threw something at her while she was holding her baby & the media were like “shame he missed”
The media CANNOT be as propagandistic as they are. Things HAVE to get back to some kind of normal. It’s only been like 15 years since things were a lot more normal.
Sarah knows the risk. She’ll be fine.
Have you been a VP candidate or governor of a state, or are you now essentially a declared candidate for the 2012 election? Have you been subject to attempted attacks previously? Are the media building up a demonized image of you?
If so then yes 100% you should dude.
Otherwise if you are just another outspoken guy then you have to watch your own back. Besides that’s way more fun anyway
If the Palins were liberal Demos, the “media” would be all over this on their high horses complaining about how low the American people have gone.
It would seem to me to be a mistake for her not to have personal security. I would want someone on my kids at the very least.
I’m sure Sarah and Todd are well equipped to handle the situation should it arise. AK has unrestricted CCW like AZ and I’d wager both carry.
yes she does.
She needs to hire some Israelis!
I don’t think merely carrying while you go about your business is enough when someone would likely sacrifice all to becom3e “a hero”.
But indeed, the Palins have made enough to pay for it until sometime in the first half of next year, when I expect Obama to return the favor that W extended to him by giving her early secret service protection. And if he doesn’t, we should scream loud and clear until he does.
How hard is it to target a political leader while hiding in a crowd of moslems in the most terrorist-ridden country in the world?
(Not very.)
What the seething, brainless liberals need to understand is that Sarah Palin doesn’t retreat.
I know this is becoming cliched, but—she reloads.
She should definatly have security, but at the moment, she would need to foot the bill. I wouldn’t assume that she doesn’t already have security.
definatly=definitely
So it’s not about “knowing the risk” any more?
That’s funny, because I’m sure the issue was whether or not “she knows the risk” a few minutes ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.