Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HARRY POTTER Deathly Hallows opens... beginning of the end....
IMdB ^ | 19 November 2010 | Dolly Howard/DollyCali

Posted on 11/19/2010 3:21:51 AM PST by DollyCali

Yes, Yes, I KNOW, we have more important things here at FR to worry about..

like is Willow preggers? why did she do potty mouth on FB, the dancing skills of Bristol

and OF COURSE the dastardly appearance of FLOTUS 99% of the time..

but here is a time out from all that heavy stuff

OFFICIAL WB SITE

The book released July 2007



Rotten Tomatoes...(skip the preview)









Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a 2010/2011 two-part epic fantasy film directed by David Yates, written by Steve Kloves and based on the novel of the same name by J. K. Rowling. The film is produced by Rowling along with David Heyman and David Barron. The two parts form the seventh and final installment in the Harry Potter film series, with the story following Harry Potter on a quest to find and destroy Lord Voldemort's secret to immortality – the Horcruxes. The films star Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter, alongside Rupert Grint and Emma Watson as Harry's best friends, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Principal photography for both parts was completed on 12 June 2010 (2010-06-12). Part 1 was released in 2D and IMAX formats and Part 2 will be released in 2D, 3D, and IMAX formats on 15 July 2011 (2011-07-15). The film will also be released with D-BOX motion code in select cinemas.



TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: cinema; deathlyhallows; harrypotter; jkrowling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Erik Latranyi

Okay, that is just so wrong in so many ways.


21 posted on 11/19/2010 7:41:19 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

They’re playing 17, actually. But it’s not bad considering that they didn’t churn out one movie every year, but it at least they didn’t make one movie every 2-3 years. That would’ve been ridiculous. At this pace, they were able to use the same actors, which would be preferable to replacing them and getting new interpretations on the role.


22 posted on 11/19/2010 7:45:39 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali

The movies have been extremely well done, but I’m in the camp of let’s get this over with already.


23 posted on 11/19/2010 10:24:21 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

As the mother of teenagers, I’m seeing that the actors don’t look 17 ... not even close. There’s a lot of change in a young person’s face and body from 16 to 21, and the HP actors are off the far end of it. At this point, they’re too old - way too old - to look right, but nothing can be done in terms of the franchise.

Of course, it started several films ago, when Neville was suddenly so tall and Ron put on all that muscle. Maybe most viewers don’t notice, but I have kids through the whole range of ages, 11 to 17, at home, and it jumps out at me.


24 posted on 11/22/2010 8:23:24 PM PST by Tax-chick (Six more days to clean your ceiling fan blades. Don't put it off until the last minute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson