To: Dr. Brian Kopp; TXnMA; lbahneman
Doc,
I keep reading "believe" and "thought", and "opinion".
I see no *data*. Just one, single, objective datum that counters the flight UPS902 data set, and I become skeptical of the contrail explanation.
I've seen nothing. Not a single smidgen, iota, or tittle of contrary data. Come on, help me out here. Help me get my conspiracy on, yo.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy. 538 posted on
12/04/2010 10:35:51 PM PST by
The Comedian
(Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
To: The Comedian
That retired Brigadier General Cash states as unequivocal fact that NORAD tracked this object, studied the film, and immediately notified the president doesn't have any effect on your thinking? None?
Did NORAD really believe the president was that interested in the "cool lighting" on the UPS902 contrail?
Wow. Put it that way, and your explanation makes sense...
:-|
539 posted on
12/05/2010 4:04:49 AM PST by
Gargantua
(Palin puts the "L" in pain... and she's coming for the scumbags!)
To: The Comedian
I see no *data*. Just one, single, objective datum that counters the flight UPS902 data set, and I become skeptical of the contrail explanation. There are dozens. You ignore them. That is why you are The Comedian. Funny joke, huh ?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson