Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/07/2010 10:39:23 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan

Government spending can jumpstart the economy in wartime. Every factory was pushed into 24/7 production of war material. Especially when millions of working-age men are drafted out of the labor force.

...and the numbers of major items produced was staggering.

The US produced almost 300,000 aircraft during the war. 44,000 Sherman tanks. 650,000 Jeeps. 675,000 2 1/2 ton trucks.

The wartime economy wasn’t natural or healthy. After the war ended, there was another nasty recession.


2 posted on 11/07/2010 10:53:17 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
2 big reasons WWII helped with ending the Depression; the US effectively destroyed our manufacturing competition and a few million less people competing for jobs....hell of a way to pull out from a depression. Hope that's not our future now.
3 posted on 11/07/2010 10:54:35 PM PST by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

Agreed. The Great American Bill Cuningham seems a bit dull at times. The Depression ended when the GOP took over the congress and FDR died after the war. FDR nursed that depression like his own baby to further his socialism.


4 posted on 11/07/2010 10:54:47 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

I caught that too. The thing of it is the ‘government spending’ that took place was not the same because it was hiring private companies to manufacture products; putting people to work. This maniacal government is spending...period. There is nothing being produced.

Cunningham seemed to catch himself though because he did say that it was FDR’s policies that extended the depression.


5 posted on 11/07/2010 10:58:04 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (No Compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
The war took care of the unemployment problem by putting 20 million men into uniform.

The depression ended when a GOP congress ended many of the regulations that the Truman adminstration wanted to keep in place.

Unlike the British, the Americans were tired with living with rationing, which is the 'ideal' for the liberals.

6 posted on 11/07/2010 11:01:54 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
It wasn't "government spending and borrowing" that boosted economic demand. It was wholesale destruction of lives and infrastructure. The German and Japanese economies rose at tremendous rates following WWII, in large part due to the number of people killed and buildings destroyed.

The Black Plague in the 1340's had a similar effect on the economy. After it was over, labor, for the first time in centuries, had value in Europe. This brought about an end to Feudalism in many places and gave rise to Capitalism.
8 posted on 11/07/2010 11:14:19 PM PST by Question Liberal Authority (Worst. Post-Racial. And Post-Partisan. Agent Of Hope And Change. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

Yes, the government can goose the economy by spending astronomical amounts of money...but it should also be pointed out that the government controlled virtually every aspect of the economy during the war years; price controls, shortages, rationing.

My point is that nobody should take the war years as being anything but a profoundly distorted period, economy wise, as far from “normal” as imaginable. And thus not usuable as a comparison to/for anything. Unemployment was probably 1.5% or something completely unattainable. If we had unemplyment at those levels we’d have hordes of illegals streaming over the border in incontrollable waves....oh wait...


9 posted on 11/07/2010 11:19:06 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Contributing to a book about GD I doesn't give you the right to print half a trillion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
Optimism is what ends economic down turns.

Optimism can be achieved in various ways.

I believe a positive person like Sarah Palin with well reasoned economic policy would be enough to change the whole picture.

10 posted on 11/07/2010 11:25:54 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper (posted a total of 1,600 threads and 9,503 replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

More like 1948. That was part of the reason that the GOP was swept into power that November.

For good sources on this, I point out historian biographer David McCullough’s ‘Truman’ and the archives of old time radio shows of that year — notably the monologues and gags of Jack Benny and Fred Allen who harped on Truman and DC Democrats mercilessly in 1948 over the economy, shortages, and general malaise. A great many returning GIs, both combat veterans and occupation forces came back to absolutely jack squat as far as jobs and opportunities.


14 posted on 11/07/2010 11:49:50 PM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

And when WWII ended, we had no equals. No one to really compete with us economically. Certainly, the Soviets were our biggest military threat. But no one was our economic equal.

And we’ve thrown just about every trump away and we’re in debt over our heads!


15 posted on 11/07/2010 11:53:10 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

Wartime spending is destruction spending that only causes recessions afterwards.

What pulled us out of depression was the return of GI’s buying products that were made here. Yes, we used to actually have factories in the US !


16 posted on 11/07/2010 11:56:09 PM PST by kingpins10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

The spending and borrowing during WWII went into mostly privately owned infrastructure if I’m not mistaken. What did the Stimulus buy? Bureaucrats?


18 posted on 11/08/2010 12:03:56 AM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

If you look at the Dow as a proxy for the US economy it was at 380 before the crash and 174 on VJ day. The market had recovered somewhat between 1932 and 1937 but remained flat throughout the war.

The market did not return to pre-crash levels until 1958. That’s 26 years of recovery, 13 of them AFTER the war.


20 posted on 11/08/2010 12:38:06 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

Excuse me, but there was no unemployment during WWII. There weren’t many consumer goods, but output was about as high as it possibly could have been.


24 posted on 11/08/2010 1:08:35 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

WWII ended unemployment.

When you take all of the unemployed men, put them in a uniform, hand them a rifle, then send them overseas, they are no longer unemployed.

Wars end unemployment the same way that arming your children and sending them out to kill neighbors ends their overindulging in the playing of video games.


26 posted on 11/08/2010 1:27:51 AM PST by Bon mots ("Anything you say, can and will be construed as racist...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

There is a problem here. In 1945 through 1946, returning armed services personel found little jobs to do. there become oppotunities for employment, education and so forth when America changed from a war production to civil consumer production. Housing construction boomed, veterans benefits for higher education boomed private enteurnership boomed too. Cunningham needs to have his facts straight before he airs them on the radio. Oh I forget Cunningham is a conservative radio host that has a tendency to insert his foot in his moth because he refuses to be prepared with the facts before speaking. No wonder Cunningham has the tendency to cause more controversy than make factual comments.


28 posted on 11/08/2010 3:15:39 AM PST by hondact200 ( Lincoln Freed the Enslaved. Obama Enslaves the Free. Obama is Americas Greatest Threat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
Got to agree. When we were the only one left standing with the ability to produce goods for sale and distribution....you bet the depression was over.

No significant competition helps a bunch.

35 posted on 11/08/2010 7:20:28 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson