Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

Great if true, but I find it hard to believe that DNA testing was done on ballots and cross-ref’d with individuals.


12 posted on 10/21/2010 7:55:06 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( A window seat, a jug of elderberry wine, and thou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Great if true, but I find it hard to believe that DNA testing was done on ballots and cross-ref’d with individuals
*************************************************
Agree and wth are they doing with a database of voter DNA?! That’s creepy...unless it’s prisoners or some such.

This is too odd, there must be more to this story.


20 posted on 10/21/2010 8:01:16 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Agreed. No way they went out and took swabs from voters. They COULD have compared DNA on the envelopes and determined they all came from the say person. But I find that hard to believe. I’ve always read that it takes quite a long time to get dna results back. Except on CSI.


50 posted on 10/21/2010 9:21:33 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Never again will I hold my nose and vote for a rino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson