Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skimask; PugetSoundSoldier
Thanks to both of you for presenting interesting and persuasive scenarios for something better than the current system. To echo a point in my initial post, I'm a traditionalist but a new approach that doesn't detract the meaning of the regular season is intriguing.

As an example of embracing the "new and improved" (and certainly not the stuff of tradition), college football overtime's system was pure genius. Initially I was skeptical of the plan, but seeing it in played out in action over the past several years (like that thrilling UDub game this past weekend) has made me a believer and a fervid advocate.

26 posted on 10/17/2010 11:30:05 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: re_nortex; skimask

There’s got to be something better than what we have now... It simply sucks and is an abject failure - see the current rankings of Ohio State and Wisconsin! It’s heavily tilted towards favorites and subjective feel.

Decide it on the field, let the better team prove who it is. You don’t get that shot if you’re TCU or BSU. You may have a great football team but you’ll never get a chance to prove you’re “the best” because the coaches and sports writers will never vote for you in the numbers required, because they will never consider you a “big school”. Doesn’t matter what the talent really is like.

And like you, I love the overtime rules. I wish the NFL did the same thing; it’s not cool to have a hard-fought game come down to who wins a coin toss for overtime possession!


28 posted on 10/17/2010 11:41:30 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson