Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christine O’Donnell Moves Up In the Polls
The Moderate Voice ^ | OCT 16TH, 2010 | JOE GANDELMAN

Posted on 10/16/2010 11:42:48 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network

Are the days of laughter about to stop? Tea Party movement member and GOP candidate for Senate in Delaware Christine O’Donnell has apparently made some big gains in the polls, seemingly with the twitch of a nose (and her debate performance against a notably stiffer Democrat Chris Coons)

(Excerpt) Read more at themoderatevoice.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christinecultists; cod; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Cringing Negativism Network

No, bashing O’Donnell is why he trolls these threads.


41 posted on 10/16/2010 1:23:12 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kenny500c

She was a kid when she dabbled, sheesh, most teenagers do something weird, and if they don’t they are just waiting to do something weird as an adult......like vote democrat. Now THAT is freaky weird!


42 posted on 10/16/2010 1:32:32 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (Defund, repeal, investigate, impeach, convict, jail, celebrate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
"No, bashing O’Donnell is why he trolls these threads."

Yup.

Somewhere, a DU is missing it's idiot.

43 posted on 10/16/2010 2:07:13 PM PDT by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I vote conservative, and therefore would never even consider backing Coons. But I also hold my party’s candidates to a higher standard than an Alvin Greene. Persons such as yourself exhibiting O’Donnell Infatuation Syndrome apparently do not.


44 posted on 10/16/2010 2:07:21 PM PDT by conimbricenses (Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses

Just saying.

From your posting history, it is you who seem “infatuated” with Senate candidate O’Donnell.

It seems to be all you post about.


45 posted on 10/16/2010 2:14:34 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (GOP establishment are dinosaurs. Tea Party is a great big asteroid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Odd. I don't believe I made so much as a single comment about her until earlier this week. Considering I've been posting here for, oh, about three years, I'd say you have a very strange definition of both posting history and infatuation.

You, on the other hand, do seem to be hovering around virtually all of the O'Donnell slobber fests of late.

46 posted on 10/16/2010 2:20:12 PM PDT by conimbricenses (Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses

Go look at your own posting history. Go ahead, I’ll wait. :)

From what’s on the most recent page - it’s all O’Donnell bashing, all the time. Bash bash bash.

I’m yes, quite enthused about her candidacy. If she wins, the significance will be stunning.

I want that. You do not.

You want her to lose. That’s crazy. Seriously, it’s crazy to want our side to LOSE.

Unless you’re on another side.

I think she’s a fabulous candidate, who has been subjected to the worst sort of Saul Alinsky tactics by people - like you.


47 posted on 10/16/2010 2:24:25 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (GOP establishment are dinosaurs. Tea Party is a great big asteroid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Perhaps you oughta look at your own too. You've made all of about 3 comments on threads that were not O'Donnell slobberfests since sometime before the beginning of the month.

It's clear you have an infatuation with her, but whatever floats your boat. Just understand that some people have legitimate questions about her intellectual capacity, personal ethics, and even sanity. Ignore those questions at your own peril because they aren't going to magically vanish over the next few weeks.

48 posted on 10/16/2010 2:27:41 PM PDT by conimbricenses (Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson