Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Odd. I don't believe I made so much as a single comment about her until earlier this week. Considering I've been posting here for, oh, about three years, I'd say you have a very strange definition of both posting history and infatuation.

You, on the other hand, do seem to be hovering around virtually all of the O'Donnell slobber fests of late.

46 posted on 10/16/2010 2:20:12 PM PDT by conimbricenses (Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: conimbricenses

Go look at your own posting history. Go ahead, I’ll wait. :)

From what’s on the most recent page - it’s all O’Donnell bashing, all the time. Bash bash bash.

I’m yes, quite enthused about her candidacy. If she wins, the significance will be stunning.

I want that. You do not.

You want her to lose. That’s crazy. Seriously, it’s crazy to want our side to LOSE.

Unless you’re on another side.

I think she’s a fabulous candidate, who has been subjected to the worst sort of Saul Alinsky tactics by people - like you.


47 posted on 10/16/2010 2:24:25 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (GOP establishment are dinosaurs. Tea Party is a great big asteroid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson