Posted on 10/15/2010 6:12:49 PM PDT by RobinMasters
A team of U.S. attorneys based in California has argued to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that there essentially is nothing the American public can do to determine if, in fact, Barack Obama is qualified under the U.S. Constitution's demand for a "natural born citizen" in the Oval Office, and if they are injured, at least they are all injured alike.
The arguments were presented in a brief submitted by U.S. Attorney Andre Birotte Jr. and his assistants Roger West and David DeJute in defense of a lawsuit that was brought by a long list of plaintiffs including a presidential candidate, members of the military, members of the state legislature and others against Obama.
The plaintiffs had asked the appeals court to reopen the arguments because the district court's ruling, left standing, would strip minorities in the United States of "all political power" and leave laws to be based "upon the whims of the majority."
That earlier brief was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, who is representing Wiley S. Drake, a vice presidential candidate on the 2008 ballot in California, and Markham Robinson, an elector from the state.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
It certainly would seem so if they can't be enforced.
The announcements did not say where he was born.
Instead of telling us who doesn’t have standing perhaps these experts could tell us who does.
This seems very weird. Instead of providing the court with documented proof of natural born citizenship, the US Attys (who are working directly for the AG, who works directly for the President) are arguing that it can’t be proven. The only way it can’t be proven is if there is no birth certificate, basically.
Mine said the same thing - and he said there is no way the media would let a politician lie about such a thing.
I don’t think there’s even anybody running against him in this election. Maybe I’ll have to write in somebody’s name ‘cause there’s no way I’ll ever vote for anybody that stupid.
Has anyone considered that 0baMao is not the son of Stanley Ann Dunham, that she did not give birth to him in Kenya but Barack Hussein Obama Sr. did bring him to her from Kenya? His son by some white bimbo in Kenya or by one of his Kenyan wives and her white lover?
Congress? What Congress? They don’t have the b**ls!
I think Stanley Ann Dunham is his mother but maybe Barak Hussein Obama Sr. is not his father. He only changed his name after he grew up. His name is actually Barry Soetoro. I bet the birth certificate lists muslim as his religion and the Soetoro guy as his father. Indonesia is 97% muslim. What are the chances he is not a muslim? Slim to none. Didn’t Michelle once state that his stepfather adopted him? That right there would make him a non U.S. citizen. Heck, that comminist guy who mentored him could be his father.
Obama resembles these two the most: “Grandpa” Dunham and Malcolm X. Malcolm X became disillusioned with NOI because he learned that Elijah Muhammed had fathered a number of children by teenage girls (his secretaries). Perhaps his righteous indignation wasn’t so righteous?
Whatever the genetics, the DNA sure produced one bad seed.
There’s a whole bunch the American public can do against the elitist pigs in DC. Imagine DC as an insect and 300 million Americans as a thumb.
I know pretty much all the “history” on him that’s available. He didn’t start out as Soetoro though. Stanley didn’t meet Soetoro until little Barry was several years old. No BC lists religion that I know of.
You have hit the nail right on the head.
#1 - VOTE!!
#2 - after that, if TPTB ignore the will of The People, then it’s time to emulate our forefathers
The silent majority is no longer silent - AND we are the majority.
Good question.
Arizona tried last April. The bill passed the House, died in the Senate for lack of Republican support. AZ Senate is 60% Republican.
Disgusting.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/04/29/20100429arizona-birther-bill-stalls.html
I had to look to be sure this wasn't John Semmons writing this...
Is this an admission to the entire world, dignitaries of all nations, that Obama can not or will not prove his eligibility for the office of president of the USA and the court system of the United States of America is protecting the apparent corruption of the administration in question and not the interests of the people of the nation or the nation's judicial integrity and disregard for the Constitution of the United States.
Sounds to this non-lawyer like the description of a class-action suit...
Yes, the great mystery of the century, and rivals the question: Who killed JFK? Who is Obama’s father and where was he born? He is the spitting image of Malcolm X and his mother was a groupie in Seattle that hung out with communists and blacks about the same time Malcolm X made a trip to Seattle to give a speech. Just saying.......but still, it makes no sense, as Obama would then be an official American citizen and would actually be proud of her parentage. So, the mystery continues. The truth will out after his fall from grace.
Your summation of the situation sounds accurate. Next question would be what are our intelligence agencies doing to protect and defend this nation from enemies foreign and domestic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.