Posted on 10/13/2010 4:09:40 AM PDT by DBCJR
When Alamo finds answer? That will be when pigs fly. LOL
Michelle Obama has been described as a “distinguished attorney” despite the fact that Michelle Obama has been “inactive” since 1993.
Michelle has been on court ordered inactive status with the Illinois State Attorneys bar from 1993, after only 4 years of practicing law. What did she do?
This Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) suspension is for discipline reasons...not for those volunteering to stop practicing. It is COURT ORDERED...not “Michelle Obama ordered.” Their website is very clear about their function and why they step in.
An attorney, points out, “sounds more to me like she was drummed right out of the practice of law. I am just dying to know what she did... she ran to have a court ordered inactive status done...and then no malpractice report needed to be provided.
She wanted this to “go away” fast and furious and the details not come out in depositions, courtroom documents, rulings for the client/plaintiffs...etc..
The ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.
Their principal purpose is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer’s fitness to practice law in Illinois. If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, they will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges. The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely).
The ARDC cannot impose fines, imprison, obtain monetary damages, enforce remedies between the lawyer and client, or seek civil or criminal relief against a lawyer as part of the disciplinary process. They can affect only the lawyer’s ability to practice law in Illinois.
They are not funded by taxpayers’ money. They are funded entirely by the annual registration fees paid by attorneys authorized to practice law in Illinois.
Original sources and links at:
http://theobamafile.com/ObamaWife.htm
Search on “license”
Many unanswered questions about these two dirtbags.
“This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn’t seem to give a crap about his law license.”
IIRC, being editor of the Harvard Law Review, is something like “queen for a day”.
Everyone in the law school gets to be editor for a very short stint.
2 Thessalonians 2:8 And then shall that Wicked* be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
*459 anomos {an'-om-os}
from 1 (as a negative particle) and 3551; TDNT - 4:1086,646; adj
AV - without law 4, transgressor 2, wicked 2, lawless 1, unlawful 1; 10
1) destitute of (the Mosaic) law
1a) of the Gentiles
2) departing from the law, a violator of the law, lawless, wicked
Didja search under his many aliases?
Two and a half years ago a fellow poster at the Texas Darling blog managed to access the files index, probably the ARDC mentioned in the article, and discovered that Michelle's file had a reference number indicating ‘insurance fraud’. Rather than lose her license she, perhaps, surrendered it voluntarily? Who knows!
As to Barak Obama, I suspect it's something along the lines of he just didn't want to be bothered with a law license, renewal, and all that. Hell — anyone seriously think this guy is going to earn a living as a lawyer? That takes effort.
See my posting at #8.
“Many unanswered questions about these two dirtbags.”
Now you’re just saying that because they are deemed “black.” That would make you a racist! as if I need the sarc tag
moochelle was disbarred... or that is what I have read on FR.
LLS
Both Obama's have law licenses. Both have voluntarily had their licenses put in an inactive status. This is not uncommon for attorneys who are working in positions where they are not practicing law because it means they don't have to keep up with the continuing legal education requirements. Unlike Clinton, their licenses were not taken away from them, they were not disbarred or suspended. This issue has been covered over and over again. There are a whole lot of things to be critical of both Obama's over but this isn't one of them.
Someone in Chicago’s legal circles has to know what happened. Maybe now that Zero is not so popular, they’ll come forward, tell their story and make a ton of money.
i read she voluntarily gave up her license before they disbarred her.
Step lightly, Johnny. Vaya con Dios.
;-\
Non-Sequitur. Hi.
How normal at FR to see a RomneyBOT such as you eager
to defend Obama.
No law licence? RomneyBOT defends.
No birth certificate? RomneyBOT defends.
TARP? RomneyBOT defends.
ObamaCARE. RomneyBOT defends.
Hmmmmmmmm. mmmmm. mmmmm.
I understand that both law license cases are kept secret - that is, both Obama’s are hiding the reason their law licenses were pulled.
But the MSM doesn’t care. “That” might be embarrassing .....
He probably never got one ‘cuz he coulnd’t pass the Bar and knew it...
"I am just dying to know what she did..."
That is, if you really mean this... LOL.
8^O
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.