Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JDW11235
"But it’s best to go for the small government and have individuals and communities resolve their problems at the appropriate level than have a monstrous federal or even state government bearing down on you, 24/7. That’s my take."

I agree with that. One problem is that so few people are truly interested in government. They vote in every other presidential election, and thats it. If more people were actively and patriotically involved in their local government, trying to do whats best for their local area, then I believe that the federal government wouldn't be so out of control.

11 posted on 10/03/2010 6:12:57 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (Pablo is very whiney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Celtic Cross

“One problem is that so few people are truly interested in government. They vote in every other presidential election, and thats it. If more people were actively and patriotically involved in their local government, trying to do whats best for their local area, then I believe that the federal government wouldn’t be so out of control.”

Agreed, to a point. I think if politicians were stopped at the local level, instead of the knee-jerk party lever polling, we’d be in a better place. The pols learned long ago what letter (D/R) to attach to their name in what district and get elected. If people even knew the issues, they’d weed out a ton of the politicials by their own words. People don’t want tyranny, they want to be lazy, but that just brings tyranny.

There’s three parts of society, the producers, the tyrants and the enables. I think a lot of “Big L” libertarians fall in the enabler group.


22 posted on 10/03/2010 6:27:36 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson