Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Germany end World War One reparations after 92 years with £59m final payment
Daily Mail ^ | September 28, 2010 | Allan Hall

Posted on 09/28/2010 6:49:01 AM PDT by C19fan

World War One finally ends for Germany on Sunday - 92 years after the guns fell silent and nearly nine million men lay dead - as it pays off the last chunk of reparations imposed on it by the Allies. A final payment of 69.9 million euros, or £59.3 million, writes off the crippling debt which was the price for one world war - and laid the foundations for another.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: germany; godsgravesglyphs; reparations; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: wideawake

Thank you.


101 posted on 09/28/2010 11:47:07 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

It’s an amazing mental gyration that NEUTRAL American ships have a god given right to right to conduct commerce with one belligerent (England) but not the other. (Germany)

The same people fainting dead away at the unrestricted sinking of ships trading with England, were fully prepared to sink any neutral ship that dared to try to make a German Port.


102 posted on 09/28/2010 11:49:27 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
(1) to demonstrate to the people of the Confederacy that Union armies could operate at will in their heartland and that their own armed forces could not defend them and (2) to isolate Lee from Johnston

Well, it was also intended to destroy the South's ability to wage war, by destroying property rather than killing people. This was a laudable goal, the people who starved due to the destruction of property notwithstanding.

103 posted on 09/28/2010 12:04:29 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Well, they lost their empires, and Africa lost what little bit of civilization it had absorbed. Or... wait, maybe the brutality of the Africans was learnt at the hands of their masters the british, french, and belgians. And dutch.


104 posted on 09/28/2010 12:06:42 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Gonna cry more tears over the poor Japanese civilians ‘murdered in their crib’ at Nagasaki? Does it register to you for even a second that it was either them, or many millions more (including US troops)?

When I argue with the America haters I always remind them that if we were going to lose a million men conquering the mainland, they were probably going to lose FOUR MILLION Japanese, many by their own hands, so against that back drop getting out for one or two hundred thousand was by far the best and most humane option for all. And it sent a necessary message to the rest of the world.

105 posted on 09/28/2010 12:21:44 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
Well, it was also intended to destroy the South's ability to wage war, by destroying property rather than killing people.

Correct. Basically to show that Union troops could supply themselves from the land just as well as the Confederates could.

It also demonstrated that the people of the Confederacy had plenty to eat, despite the near-starving condition of their soldiers in 1864.

This was a laudable goal, the people who starved due to the destruction of property notwithstanding.

No one starved due to the march.

As most soldiers on the march noted, there was more food than they could eat or carry. They made it a point to destroy cotton gins and to roast up any livestock they found, as well as wrecking railroads. According to army estimates, the soldiers seized about a quarter million bushels of grain and more than 5,000 tons of hay as well as 15,000 head of cattle and 10,000 mules and horses.

But all these numbers are tiny fractions of the South's resources.

Truth be told, the march was about 250 miles long and about 60 miles wide - one-quarter of one state. It involved 62,000 troops and lasted 5 weeks.

There was not enough men or time to even really skim the surface - a quarter million bushels was less than 1% of grain production in 1860 Georgia.

The main effect was psychological - "A Yankee can walk up to my home in the heart of the Confederacy, steal all my hams, roast up my cattle, take my silverware and my best clothes, run off my slaves, drink my liquor, take my horses and burn my stable - and just get away with it?"

106 posted on 09/28/2010 12:50:15 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
Not only was dropping the bomb the most humane option for securing their surrender, but, as I initially pointed out, they got a rather sweeter deal post-war than they had ANY right to expect.

They were expecting (and perhaps deserved) that we would do to them what they did to China. Imagine their shock when, instead of industrialized rape and mass murder - our GI’s wanted to trade chocolate bars and nylons and/or money for sex - and no mass executions were forthcoming.

107 posted on 09/28/2010 12:50:16 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
I would give Canada credit too--they came into the war to support the mother country even though it wasn't really any of their concern. Germany was no threat to Canada.

Australians and New Zealanders also fought and died for the British Empire, but their governments also put people in concentration camps just because of their ancestry, namely immigrants from Austria-Hungary, including those who would have eagerly signed up to fight against Austria or had sworn allegiance to their adopted country.

108 posted on 09/28/2010 1:23:07 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I wouldn't use the word "inevitable"(always problematic in historical discussions). After all, opposition was to entry was still strong enough that even though the Germans resumed sub-warfare, the U.S. did not declare war until April. In any case, I agree with you that the German resumption of sub warfare made war extremely likely.

On a side note, it is worth mentioning that the British mining of the North Sea (which began in 1914 before sub warfare) was just as much an act of war against the U.S. in a legal sense met with at best feeble protests by Wilson.

109 posted on 09/28/2010 2:27:24 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Naval Shipyard as of 1908, they built and repaired ships there from that time onward.
110 posted on 09/28/2010 3:09:15 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Yeah but I don’t think there were ever a “fleet” there to attack until 1940.


111 posted on 09/28/2010 3:10:52 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Naval Shipyards have naval ships there, being built or reparied or serviced.

Where do you think we had our Pacific fleet in 1914 if not near, around, going to and from Naval Shipyards like Pearl Harbor?

I just remember Barbara Tuchman mentioning it as a historic curiosity that the Kaisers agents suggested that the Japanese attack our Naval fleet in the Pacific, including Pearl Harbor, during WWI.

112 posted on 09/28/2010 3:16:14 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I was referring to your comment and merely pointing out that our fleet was not based at Pearl Harbor at that time.


113 posted on 09/28/2010 3:18:16 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Where was our Pacific fleet based in 1914?

Either way, your comment was incorrect that it was a minor target at that time. It was a Naval Shipyard as of 1908, thus a major target, if not THE major target.

“if you can name a target, a military target, then name the system.”

114 posted on 09/28/2010 3:23:15 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
San Diego and later San Pedro.

I'll say it once more & then I'll drop it... you said the Japanese were encouraged to attack our fleet at Pearl Harbor during WWI, which was impossible because our fleet was not there at the time.

I'm not saying its your error, I'm just saying our fleet was not there.

115 posted on 09/28/2010 3:39:21 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

BTW Japan was a member of the Entente powers from August 1914, when the British were urging them to attack German possessions in the Pacific.


116 posted on 09/28/2010 3:55:36 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
My mistake then.

Must have been something like ‘attacked our Naval Shipyard at Pearl Harbor’ which I misremembered as “attack our Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor” which was an anachronism, as you pointed out, because our Pacific fleet was not stationed out of Pearl Harbor at that time. But there was a Naval Shipyard there, and the Kaiser's agents did recommend that the Japanese attack us there.

My apologies for the mistake and my intransigence! ;)

117 posted on 09/28/2010 3:55:42 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I guess all of those abandoned artillery emplacements found today around Oahu must’ve been meant to counter a threat from somebody.


118 posted on 09/28/2010 4:14:00 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Never seen those, but have been through the ones off San Francisco and Seattle!
119 posted on 09/28/2010 4:24:06 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna; nickcarraway

· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach ·
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
 Antiquity Journal
 & archive
 Archaeologica
 Archaeology
 Archaeology Channel
 BAR
 Bronze Age Forum
 Discover
 Dogpile
 Eurekalert
 Google
 LiveScience
 Mirabilis.ca
 Nat Geographic
 PhysOrg
 Science Daily
 Science News
 Texas AM
 Yahoo
 Excerpt, or Link only?
 


Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution. Thanks C19fan.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
 

· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword ·
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·


120 posted on 09/28/2010 5:31:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson