Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hidden Real Estate Sales tax in Health care bill – Surprise!
Canada freepress ^ | September 14, 2010 | By Dr. Laurie Roth

Posted on 09/26/2010 9:29:18 AM PDT by opentalk

Hidden Real Estate Sales tax in Health care bill – Surprise!There are already at least 20 hidden taxes in the Obama Health care plan coming down upon us the next few years. So, along with rationed care for seniors and forced health insurance, we now find there is a Real Estate Tax snuck into the Health care plan. You may ask, what in God’s green earth does health care have to do with Real Estate taxes??? Absolutely nothing, that is precisely why one got snuck in there.

....I was forwarded this latest tax scheme by Van Hipp, President of American Defense International and the former Deputy Secretary of the Army under Bush senior and Ronald Reagan. He recommended the well known accountant and expert witness on tax matters, Paul Guppy who wrote a commentary on the various hidden taxes in the Spokesman Review paper, “Health Law’s Heavy impact.”

Starting in 2013, not only will you pay the closing costs and real estate fee when you sell your house but now you will pay a 3.8% Sales Tax. So, if you sell your home for $400,000, perhaps wanting to down size if you are a senior you will pay $15,200 in Tax.

Here we have another assault on our seniors again. Many downsize their homes as retirement comes closer, so along with long lines and rationed care that is substandard, seniors and anyone will have to pay more tax on the home they just sold.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: obamacare; seniors; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: avacado

In regard to the real estate tax, I believed the language has been misinterpreted and subsequent arithmetic wildly incorrect. This accounting might be if interest to all the posters here who make more than $250 per year. For the rest of us this is not applicable.

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/a-38-percent-sales-tax-on-your-home/


41 posted on 09/28/2010 9:10:08 AM PDT by d2bernhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: d2bernhard
You're right that a lot of incorrect information is going about this sales tax. But here's a question: do they consider the profit to be part of your income? And the income levels are not indexed to inflation so in about 10 years or so someone making $200K will be much more common.
42 posted on 09/28/2010 9:43:14 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: avacado

it is my understanding that it is on profit amounts over $250K for individuals, $500K for married couples.


43 posted on 10/04/2010 12:07:20 PM PDT by a real Sheila (REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER! REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER! REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

WA state already has a tax on the sale of real estate. They call it an excise tax. It is usually assessed on the seller of the home, unless the seller is moving out of state and then they assess the tax on the buyer. You usually don’t get a chance to contest it because you don’t even know about it before closing, unless you are up on real estate dealings.


44 posted on 10/04/2010 12:17:09 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Just in case the facts actually matter to anybody, this posting is untrue and has been known to be untrue for many months. There is no tax on the sale price of a home. There is a tax on capital gains in excess of $500,000 (for a couple) if the couple has a total income of over $250,000. So, if a couple with income over $250,000 sold a house for 1 million dollars, if they had bought the house for more than $500,000, there would be no tax. If they bought the house for $400,000, then they would be taxed on $100,000 not on 1 million. So this “poor family” who earns over $250,000 and just made $600,000 on the sale of the house would be required to pay $3500. Should we be running a benefit for them to help them out of this jam??


45 posted on 10/06/2010 11:36:17 AM PDT by Getreal3 (Get the facts right!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson