Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/25/2010 1:07:49 AM PDT by Palter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Another theory, ping.


2 posted on 09/25/2010 1:08:26 AM PDT by Palter (If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it. ~ Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter

Slave labor. Most infants can construct a pyramid out of sand. Many will with no outside help. These people had backs to break, and I’m sure they broke them.


3 posted on 09/25/2010 1:10:40 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter
And how was the master architect able to communicate detailed, highly precise plans to a workforce of 10,000 illiterate men?

The same way liberals communicate to their supporters. Duh...
4 posted on 09/25/2010 1:13:47 AM PDT by pennyfarmer (Even a RINO will chew its foot off when caught in a trap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter

Looks like a pyramid scheme to me.


6 posted on 09/25/2010 1:15:48 AM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter

Were the Hebrew slaves illiterate?


9 posted on 09/25/2010 2:10:08 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter
The pyramid blocks were most likely poured. That is, they took wagon-loads of stone (of a reasonable size) from the quarry, poured same into formers, and then poured some liquid binding agent into the frame so that it hardened into a block. Trying to carve fitting stones from a quarry would waste 2/3 of the material and quickly turn the quarry into a heap of rubble.

The word 'pyramid' is a Greek word, the root part being the familiar 'pyr' (fire) which we also see in words like 'pyrotechnics', 'pyromaniac' etc. They originally had golden tips and acted like lightning rods, generating what you'd call St. Elmo's fire, which served for religious purposes.

10 posted on 09/25/2010 2:29:50 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter

It seems to me we still have no idea HOW they moved the blocks into place, or WHO built it. Christopher Dunn, in the “Giza Power Plant”, (Amazon) explained WHAT it is


20 posted on 09/25/2010 3:37:07 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter; wendy1946; allmost
or, there's an alternate theory :)

Dinosaurs helped build the pyramids, school director says

25 posted on 09/25/2010 3:58:04 AM PDT by Cronos (This Church is holy, the one Church, the true Church, the Catholic Church-St.Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ..

· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach ·
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
 Antiquity Journal
 & archive
 Archaeologica
 Archaeology
 Archaeology Channel
 BAR
 Bronze Age Forum
 Discover
 Dogpile
 Eurekalert
 Google
 LiveScience
 Mirabilis.ca
 Nat Geographic
 PhysOrg
 Science Daily
 Science News
 Texas AM
 Yahoo
 Excerpt, or Link only?
 


Thanks Palter. He hasn't really shown anything, other than a need for modern cranes in ancient Egypt. :')

great pyramid site:freerepublic.com
Google
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
 

· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword ·
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·


32 posted on 09/25/2010 6:02:49 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter
The REAL secret of the pyramids...


35 posted on 09/25/2010 7:23:31 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (King: "I have a dream"...Sharpton: "I want a check")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

read


44 posted on 09/25/2010 12:14:24 PM PDT by sauropod (The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter

The blocks are concrete poured in place.


45 posted on 09/25/2010 12:38:41 PM PDT by stockpirate ("......When the government fears the people you have liberty." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter

The book “The Pyramids: An Enigma Solved” by Joseph Davidovits was first published around 1989 and addressed the subject of the stone blocks of the pyramids being cast in place rather than being quarried. The author made some very interesting and compelling arguments in favor.

The author also addressed the monoliths of the temple at Baalbek in Lebanon, where one of the stones that forms the foundation of the temple is 1200 tons. The author argues that there was no possible mechanism in the ancient world to move an object of this size and weight and this is further confirmation that the cast-in-place method was in use in the Middle East at that time.

There are some problems with his theory, as would be expected, the details of which I won’t go into. The best overall discussion of a possible history of the pyramids that I’ve read so far is “Pyramid Quest” by Dr. Robert Schoch. Schoch is a geologist who was pilloried by the Egyptology community twenty years ago for making the obvious and simple observation that there is evidence of water erosion on the Sphinx. Schoch argues that the pyramids (and the Sphinx) greatly predate the Old Kingdom and were built in stages over a very long period of time, probably millenia. No supernatural agents, aliens or any other deus ex machina figure in Schoch’s theory.

One of the most interesting arguments about the age and building of the pyramids was made to me by an investment banker. He said that we should get an estimate of how much it would cost to build the pyramid today and then multiply that cost by the labor efficiency we have today versus that of third millennium BC Egypt. He speculated it would cost at least several billion dollars today and that the the economic output per person back then was probably one one hundredth of what it is today. The several hundred billion dollar effective cost of construction of the pyramid would have consumed a large multiple of the entire GDP of Egypt of that era for decades and possibly centuries, to the exclusion of all other economic activity, all for a project with no identifiable economic benefits.

The theory has been around forever that the pyramid workers were idle farmers in the off season. The problem is in a subsistence existence, there is no idle season. If the Egyptian farmers were not planting, weeding and irrigating or harvesting, then they were making or repairing their tools and domiciles, fishing, making pottery and baskets, etc. The same argument applies to slave laborers. Slaves have to be economically productive just like free men and all the time.

The conventional wisdom on a lot of things, including Egyptology, congealed about a century ago and have been largely immovable ever since. Since I developed an interest in these matters the thing I’ve found most interesting is how very thin the gruel is on which this conventional wisdom is founded, this just being one example. Part of that conventional wisdom that should be discarded is that the pyramids were built in a very limited time window with very limited resources during the Old Kingdom of Egypt.


50 posted on 09/25/2010 4:50:06 PM PDT by KamperKen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter

ping


54 posted on 09/25/2010 8:57:12 PM PDT by misanthrope (Liberals just plain suck!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Palter; SunkenCiv
It's a fascinating problem, but however they did it, it must have been really hard and really expensive. When you compare the number of pyramids to the number of rulers and dynasties very few were ever built and the greatest, at Giza, were built very early.

Saw the King Tut exhibit here recently. It's really spectacular. The quality and detail of the statuary and gold objects that were preserved in the tomb is incredible.

59 posted on 09/27/2010 12:11:58 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


60 posted on 09/27/2010 5:22:59 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson