Skip to comments.
White House Tries to Discredit FORBES Over Obama Cover Story
Human Events ^
| September 23, 2010
| Human Events
Posted on 09/24/2010 8:48:38 AM PDT by opentalk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
09/24/2010 8:48:40 AM PDT
by
opentalk
To: opentalk
Struck a nerve that’s for certain.
2
posted on
09/24/2010 8:50:40 AM PDT
by
bkepley
To: opentalk
When is Obama gonna learn, bad enough to pick a fight with a guy who buys ink by the barrel, but when electrons on a screen cost nothing?
3
posted on
09/24/2010 8:51:22 AM PDT
by
Braak
(The US Military, the real arms inspectors!)
To: opentalk
If the suppositions of the article were wrong, and the article was about GW Bush, then Bush would have never even bothered to recognize the article at all.
4
posted on
09/24/2010 8:52:17 AM PDT
by
DallasDeb
(USAFA '06 Mom)
To: DallasDeb
In other words, Forbes hit a sore spot with Obama—one of truth.
5
posted on
09/24/2010 8:53:24 AM PDT
by
DallasDeb
(USAFA '06 Mom)
To: opentalk
Great strategy, Gibbels!
After all, the whole country hasn’t yet read D’Souza’s article. So, the White House must keep it in the news ...
6
posted on
09/24/2010 8:53:39 AM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: opentalk
The most thin-skinned president, ever.
7
posted on
09/24/2010 8:53:54 AM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Utopia is being foisted on Americans for their own good.-- J. Robert Smith)
To: opentalk
Sorry White Party House...you can't UN-ring a bell.
8
posted on
09/24/2010 8:54:26 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(obama can only be what WE allow him to be.)
To: opentalk
What a thin-skinned crybaby.
Think of all the stuff that was printed and said about Bush, most of it FALSE, and Bush never uttered even one complaint.
For all his faults, at least Bush was a man.
0bama is such a baby.
9
posted on
09/24/2010 8:55:23 AM PDT
by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: opentalk
Gee, what a surprise! Instead of meaningful discourse on the subject matter, we get 100% shoot-the-messenger ad hominem attacks. Like the beleaguered football coach who has called an unsuccessful draw play on third and long for the one millionth time, each time the libs trot out this tired approach, it becomes even less successful than the previous attempt.
10
posted on
09/24/2010 8:56:42 AM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(If not for the double standard, liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: opentalk
You get the most flak when over the target.
11
posted on
09/24/2010 8:57:00 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
(FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
To: Braak
Ding! Ding! Posting of the week, IMHO.
12
posted on
09/24/2010 8:58:35 AM PDT
by
pingman
(Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
To: Braak
I guess the modern version of the saying would be “Don’t pick a fight with a guy who buys ink by the barrel, or web servers by the rack.”
To: opentalk
Obie doesn't really believe in the Free Press...or Free Speech...
Dictators are like that...
To: opentalk
How Obama Thinks. It's easy to discredit Forbes based on the title alone.
15
posted on
09/24/2010 9:13:06 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: opentalk
The article mentions, at the end, that “the White House called in Forbes Washington Bureau Chief to read him the riot act.”
16
posted on
09/24/2010 9:14:18 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: opentalk
I cancelled Forbes because their columnist John Rogers was Obama’s earliest financial supporter and got him elected. Forbes made Rogers very rich even though he ia a middling money manager. I have no use for Forbes.
17
posted on
09/24/2010 9:15:15 AM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
To: DCBryan1
Should be interesting if the book becomes a best seller.
18
posted on
09/24/2010 9:17:53 AM PDT
by
opentalk
To: opentalk
Just for once, it might be nice to see the Obama War Room kick into “high gear” when America’s security interests were threatened, rather than when a conservative essayist wrote an article critical of the President’s priorities.
19
posted on
09/24/2010 9:20:08 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: opentalk
Jeez. You would have thought they said
20
posted on
09/24/2010 9:23:57 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Rebellion is Brewing! Just Vote the Bums Out!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson