Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple Sued for the Sale of Video Programming on iTunes
Patently Apple ^ | September 22, 2010

Posted on 09/22/2010 6:30:50 PM PDT by Swordmaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: SwedeBoy2
...not having to answer the same question multiple times from people that are too lazy to read the post.

OR YOUR ...not having to answer the same question multiple times from people that you, who are too lazy to read the post ARTICLE.

You like to download music TO DEFEAT PURCHASE of SAME and you are mad at Apple because they do things to thwart your efforts.

Poor baby... go back to your mom's basement and leave the men and women alone!


21 posted on 09/23/2010 2:21:23 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Faith is putting all your eggs in God's basket, then counting your blessings before they hatch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SwedeBoy2
So, Yes I have good reason to dislike Apple and their troublesome and time consuming copy protection schemes.

The iTunes Store hasn't had copy protection on music for a while. And AFAIK, all legal video services use some sort of copy protection.

22 posted on 09/23/2010 6:11:21 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Here are the steps of claim 20 for processing a video program: They basically patented the general idea of storing video and outputting it at different resolutions, framerates and cropping on demand. Basically, this is taking most video processing programs and running your 24fps source through standard crop, telecine and resize filters.

That this patent was even granted shows the sad state of our patent system.

23 posted on 09/23/2010 6:21:42 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I down loaded the I phone software yesterday. Wonder if they will include me in the suit as “all persons in active concert or participation with them.”


24 posted on 09/23/2010 6:59:40 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
has further asked the court to consider tripling the damages accessed if the damages are not found by a jury

What the heck kind of legal mumbo-jumbo is that? If the jury does NOT find damages, then they ask the court to TRIPLE damages? What??? is that kind of like "Heads I win, tails you lose?"

25 posted on 09/23/2010 7:49:07 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

When was the patent granted? Such details and processes have been in use for a very long time in the area of video production... particularly on the Macintosh platform...


26 posted on 09/23/2010 7:52:24 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
Incidentally, I purchase MP3s from eMusic.com, and rip MP3s from my own CDs and vinyl. The MP3s play perfectly fine on all my players -- one from Samsung, one from Apple, and one from Neuros called an HD from a few years back.

Details, details... don't confuse the haters with details (and the truth)... it just makes them mad.

27 posted on 09/23/2010 7:58:22 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Lest we forget what got Apple into the DRM business in the first place - it was a requirement many of the publishers/labels required to give them license to carry/sell their music and videos. The labels were very skeptical of online sales of their material in digital downloadable format. They demanded security to prevent piracy (which of course is a moving target at best). What I find interesting is that those same labels have not required the same protection from other sellers (Amazon being one).


28 posted on 09/23/2010 8:02:38 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Filed in 98, issued in 03. Running a source video through a series of filters including telecine (frame rate change from 24fps) and resize to achieve the desired effect dates at least back to the mid 90s for computers.


29 posted on 09/23/2010 9:48:46 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
What I find interesting is that those same labels have not required the same protection from other sellers

Jobs had already gotten one label to agree to non-DRM music before the Amazon store beta appeared. Eventually they all agreed.

30 posted on 09/23/2010 9:51:25 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bert
I down loaded the I phone software yesterday. Wonder if they will include me in the suit as “all persons in active concert or participation with them.”

They're lawyers. How deep are your pockets???

31 posted on 09/23/2010 9:57:03 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
They basically patented the general idea of storing video and outputting it at different resolutions, framerates and cropping on demand. Basically, this is taking most video processing programs and running your 24fps source through standard crop, telecine and resize filters.

Yup... something that has been done since Movies were being sent to TV... at 30 frames per second in less than widescreen. Note also that this is a process that Apple does not do... it is done by the companies that convert the movies to digital format and place them on either DVD, BluRay, or digital HD storage formats from whatever original 24 frame per second format they were recorded in... film, analogue video or what have you. This invention—if valid,which I doubt, since they really don't tell how they accomplish this feat, just that it can be done—simply does not apply to Apple any more than it would apply to any cable, satellite or other provider who sends a movie that winds up being displayed on a TV that is shown at a display that is other than the original width or aspect ratio in pixel sizes.

32 posted on 09/23/2010 10:06:44 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
What the heck kind of legal mumbo-jumbo is that? If the jury does NOT find damages, then they ask the court to TRIPLE damages? What??? is that kind of like "Heads I win, tails you lose?"

I think what you have there is a failure of editing and writing...

33 posted on 09/23/2010 10:08:03 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson