Isn’t Holdren the dope that thought there were too many people inhabiting the earth? Does he have a new term for babys too?
********************************EXCERPT**************************************
Dr. Dave says:
At the core of this claim is a fundamental political necessity – it’s the fault of mankind. They have chipped away at the periphery and implicated other gases (e.g. CFCs, methane, NOx and SOx) but their primary target remains CO2. If you control CO2 you control energy and if you control energy you control the world’s economies. Control of economies is the ultimate measure of control (right up there with food and water).
Trouble is…CO2 (in theory) can only do ONE thing – make the planet slightly warmer many, many decades in the future. How does one extrapolate this into “global climate disruption”? They used “climate change” as they thought it might cover their butts in the event that it became cooler or didn’t change. Most sentient individuals now see “climate change” for the gigantic fraud that it is. Honestly, even if the IPCC’s wildly inflated claims were true, who in their right mind is going to get upset about the planet becoming 1-2 deg warmer in their lifetime? Man, it’s a tough sell! Time to go back to the ol’ playbook and start blaming every untoward weather event on humans.
Holdren doesn’t even have a tattered theory to hand his hat on this time.
Shouldn’t it be “Global Wealth Redistribution”?
First it was Global Cooling and we were all going to freeze. Then it was Global Warming and we were all going to bake. Then it became Global Climate Change because they weren’t sure whether we would bake or freeze, but they were sure it had to do with temperature.
Now apparently it’s Global Climate Disruption, because they aren’t even sure the temperature will be any different than it otherwise would have been, but still, it’s going to be really bad, and it’s all our fault. Whatever it’s going to be the cure will be massive government intervention in the economy & massive taxation via cap and trade.
This is comical. The control freaks are still at it push their lies. Unbelievable!
changeover
warmingfor many years now, having realized that
changeis easier to support in the face of inconvenient facts than
warming. So, why the switch to
disruptionnow? For a clue, have a look at the Democrat Party's new logo:
The memo must have gone out: Change is good. They needed a new, more clearly negative word for their climate propaganda
Global Climate Disruption AKA Global Climate BS scam.