Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RachelFaith; Eaker; LongElegantLegs; Salamander

You may have noticed that during discussions and debates here on FR, many people post links to studies, news stories, judicial decisions, or expert opinion to reinforce their own opinions or knowledge of the topic at hand. It’s the polite and mature thing to do in civil intercourse.

You’re being asked to prove what you say. “Because I think so, no proof needed” just doesn’t cut it here, n00b.

If you encounter disdain, you may expect it because of your lordly attitude.


385 posted on 09/11/2010 7:20:08 AM PDT by TheOldLady (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: TheOldLady
You’re being asked to prove what you say. “Because I think so, no proof needed” just doesn’t cut it here, n00b.

First, I offered MY opinion. So did everyone else. No one posted a single citation, link, article, or otherwise. Not me. Not anyone in your coven.

So, that at worst, makes the debate even. Since, logic, would suggest that newer is better than previously broken or unknown condition.... I believe I have the 1% edge. Unless of course, one of you produces your own citations. Then the ball will be back to me for mine.

Lastly: I am not a n00b. I think I will be finally getting around to making my "about" page to address a lot of this nonsense.... :::sigh::::

403 posted on 09/11/2010 10:33:49 AM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Welcome to "The Hunt for Red November".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson