Posted on 09/10/2010 12:01:58 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs
A TERRITORY girl is lucky to be alive after she was mauled by a savage dog.
Seven-year-old Meg Croton and her brother Connor, 9, had been feeding their family's dog - an eight-year-old mastiff cross - in their Humpty Doo back yard when the girl was attacked by the vicious hound.
"I tripped on a rock and fell, and I think I kicked his leg," Meg recalled the attack. "And then it hurt very badly and he was on top of me and ripped on my head. "But my brother saved my life."
(Excerpt) Read more at ntnews.com.au ...
Oh, I think YOU know by now... I am "anything" but. LOL
Ask "Granny" what's her name... She was making a list earlier... but her adjectives, implied things FAR and away more hyper...
I’ll condense my questions into simple, easy-to-respond-to, one-sentence queries, but I’d appreciate if you’d answer them directly instead of accusing me of setting up straw men, putting words in your mouth and being of low character. Otherwise, it’s just not worth the work involved.
What do you say?
I will answer them. If you do engage in dishonest debate, I will call you for it. The rest is entirely up to you.
You oughta get that Dragon "Speech to Text" software. I had an early version, years ago, and it's awesome.
{Back to the flame war, already in progress!}
I think you just insulted all snakes.
They all lag too much, and I can actually TYPE as fast as I speak. And they can't do multiple windows or run any of my extension I use for posting. But, as a tool, I hope they continue to develop.
Welcome to the show!
No! No welcome to the show! I want no part of the war...but I may lurk a bit. Who can resist a train wreck?
Oh, I did not mean to invite you to a "war"... far from it. I said welcome to the "show", assuming of course, that you ARE here to both acquaint yourself with the thread and to observe as a guest... the audience if you will... of "the show".
As for the "train wreck"... you missed that. But, footage remains, so scroll up. This is the "clean up" phase of an aftermath.
I doubt, any but 2 or 3 folks will become or yet remain enraged and unreasonable... though, I have learned recently, and most unpleasantly, that I could be quite mistaken about that...
Pardon me, I will be right back. 20 minutes or about. I have a phone call. Didn’t want anyone to wonder “where did she go”.
Is there any END to your awesomeness?
You and your inherent AWESOMENESS make the rest of us slugs look like day old poop on a bum's shoe.
I reckon you have that special keyboard only AWESOME folks can get.
The rest of us trolls ought to shut the hell up and not just
learn, but BOW to your superior awesomeness. Truly awesome.
I shall cringe at the feet of my mistress and learn.
Okay, here we go.
1. Why do you consider my opinions, which are based on personal experience, to have “no bearing, no impact, and no relevance” on the topic at hand, when your stance on this issue is based on “Hundreds of books, classes, and hours spent with dogs and other animals”, in other words, your personal experience?
2. If having no children would have rendered my opinion on this matter irrelevant, why does being childless yourself have no effect on the relevance of yours?
3. Why did you state that “You might as well TRAIN you dog to attack and kill your children as at least then you won’t be shocked when it happens./s” if you are in fact open to debate on the subject?
And yes, I know what the sarcasm off tag is.
Stole it. Thanks!
I keep forgetting where you are. As an aside, prayers for you. I hope you are coming home soon.
Good boy.
*pat pat pat*
A *coma*?
I don’t type ‘em, I just quote ‘em.
Usually, that’s all that’s necessary....:)
[Freud wept]
Flawed reasoning. Flawed question.
First, let me see if I can add the element missing. Since you did not state it, but implied it, I will state it.
You are assuming that I am putting my experience in a position greater than yours, when I state that your experience is of no relevance to my opinion.
That is your error.
In fact my experience has no bearing on my opinion either. None. Just because your dogs haven't bitten your children, yet, is no greater or no less of a predictor of the general situation in which some other family, such as the one in this story, may find themselves, than is my experience with my dogs.
That is what I said. I did not say anything else.
I did not imply anything else.
You did. You took it, personally, as if it was a personal comment to you and about you and with regards to your child raising skills.
You took it as "You are a bad mommy". I did not say that. I did not imply that.
I do not say it now. I refute it.
Your parenting skills, your choices, nothing about you, has any bearing on this article, or my suggestion that "unknown, and untrained adult dogs are unsuited for family with small children".
Your mistake, was assuming that I was discussing you and that I was claiming a moral superiority.
In short you became defensive and hyper sensitive and reacted poorly chasing more and more inane positions which I attempted to address seriously, until, some point later in the second DAY, in which I realized your error, and pointed it out to you then, by saying "now I understand why you have taken this offense" yada yada yada... THAT post was, hundreds of posts later and a day after we began.
You either missed it, ignored it, or were too committed to the, by then, "war" to address it and things deteriorated afterwords with the actions of others, coming to the thread late.
Now, to my point, see directly above and previous: That I would NEVER NEVER NEVER put my children or suggest anyone put their children into such a situation.... I stand by it.
And of course, I know now, that because you FEEL that such a situation applies to YOU and your family in that YOU have adopted adult dogs (more than one?) and have very young children, that you are sure that I am somehow making this personal.
Again, I am not. And as I stated, I assumed you to be an older single "dog lady" stereotype. So, there was by no means, any effort to malign your decision making or parenting skills. And I said so then and say so now.
What we have, is this and ONLY this: You have made decisions you FEEL best in making. You have experience with your dogs and family to which you are comfortable. So be it.
I said and I say again: So what? Your personal experience has no bearing, is irrelevant to what OTHERS may choose for the best of their children and their families. And that is a fact.
You are free to share your experiences and offer opinions. And so am I. The end. You read far too much into it. You became emotionally invested in the outcome of my opinion because it matched your situation too closely. Nothing else was said or is intended.
If having no children would have rendered my opinion on this matter irrelevant, why does being childless yourself have no effect on the relevance of yours?
I hope you can see by the above, that it does not. Neither set of experiences act as predictors to future events in and of themselves. You just assumed that because I ruled your experience out as a predictor, that I was exempting mine.
Please recall the events in order. I did not even OFFER any of my background or experiences until much later when the attacks against me became personal and was lumped in with the "Dog Killers". THEN, I posted my experiences. And I did so one at a time. Only when they were relevant to a particular personal attack and mischaracterization of myself.
3. Why did you state that “You might as well TRAIN you dog to attack and kill your children as at least then you won’t be shocked when it happens./s” if you are in fact open to debate on the subject? And yes, I know what the sarcasm off tag is.
If you understand sarcasm, then why ask this question?
I posted above, the context. Anyone who goes and reads it can see the "tag". That is why we tag things, so people do NOT take them wrong. And while it is (pardon the pun) Biting sarcasm, it obviously held a truth too close to your personal situation for which you felt unable to resist taking personally and over reacting.
So, in summary: Opinions are like... well you know, and everyone has one and is entitled to it. Personal experiences are NOT generic predictors or relevant as such for general proofs for or against an opinion. You can offer them, and people are free to accept, dismiss or refute with their own as they see fit, and to do so without engaging in bitter hostilities.
That is exactly what I did. No more. No less.
Life is 1% of WHAT happens and 99% HOW you react to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.