Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman fears use of cell pics confiscated by cops (Axe To Grind Alert!)
The Herald News ^ | 9/03/2010 | Joe Hosey

Posted on 09/07/2010 12:39:43 AM PDT by Krankor

ROMEOVILLE -- When Bridget Polaski stored naked pictures of herself on her cell phone, she never dreamed they would fall in the hands of cops she fears will slap them all over the Internet.

"I'm just really upset about my pictures being all over the Internet, if that's where they end up landing," Polaski, 45, said of the seven or so nude cell phone photos that are now in police custody.

Bridget Polaski, of Romeoville, was brought in for questioning Aug. 26 as Romeoville police investigated car vandalism. Police kept her cell phone as part of the investigation, but Polaski fears nude photos on her the phone will be misused.

Polaski, a former stripper and club manager, said she is also worried by the prospect of the photos being digitally altered in such a way that it appears she is engaged in some depraved act.

"My daughter's 14. I'm concerned about that," she said. Police: No photos viewed Polaski lost her iPhone to the police Aug. 26 after they stopped her as she was walking home from the Weber Road Wal-Mart with her friend Tess Mulay. The two women say Polaski was handcuffed and one of the officers "asked me if my boobs were fake or real," Polaski said. "Asked me straight out."

Polaski said she "is a size 3 with fake boobs," but still found it inappropriate to be questioned about her figure by the police.

The officers confiscated her cell phone, she said, and then took her to the police station where she was questioned for about two hours. While at the station, Polaski said she heard some cops in a hallway laughing it up about her "fully nude" photos.

Deputy Police Chief Mark Turvey said none of his officers looked at Polaski's pictures and that the phone was taken as part of probe into car vandalism.

"She's a suspect in a criminal damage to property investigation and the officer had reason to believe she had text messages on her phone related to the damage and some threats she had made," Turvey said.

After seizing the cell phone officers secured a search warrant and only then began checking for messages, Turvey said.

Even though Polaski faces no charges so far in connection with the Romeoville car vandalism investigation, she is fighting a pair of driving under the influence cases out of Joliet. One is from a felony arrest in June, the other a misdemeanor charge from March.

Polaski is confident she will be acquitted in both cases. Phone still at crime lab? In the meantime, Polaski said she has called the police about her cell phone so often that she "should have been arrested for telephone harassment." Her requests to have the phone returned were rejected, she said, and a detective explained that it is now at a crime lab.

"Crime lab? What is this, 'CSI: Miami?'" Polaski asked.

Polaski explained that she has the photos on her phone because "I had a couple ex-boyfriends ask me to send them a picture. I had my girlfriend Tess take some pictures so I could text them."

Now Polaski fears a lot more people than a couple of her ex-boyfriends will get an eyeful of her, and she is not too happy with her treatment by the police either.

"I'm very upset about my rights being violated," Polaski said.

"I will fight this to the bitter end," she said. "I will not give up. I'm tired of people messing with me, just because I'm blonde and halfway decent looking."

Polaski, who describes herself as a "very right-wing, conservative Republican," said she returned to the police station hours after she was released and tried to file a report for the theft of her phone and for sexual harassment allegedly suffered at the hands of the officers. She said the police would take neither report and refused to return her phone.

A week later, still without the phone or the sensitive photographs stored on them, Polaski says she remains determined to correct her situation.

"I don't like my rights to be violated," she said.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Hobbies; Society
KEYWORDS: becausewesayso; biggestgangintown; donutwatch; phonecops; policestate; sexting; sexualharassment; tbl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
The great part- her picture featured in the paper was taken in a bar.
1 posted on 09/07/2010 12:39:45 AM PDT by Krankor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Krankor

Guilty. And cold.


2 posted on 09/07/2010 12:43:19 AM PDT by optiguy (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

While this woman is obviously no saint, I would not put it past a bunch of cops to act like stupid testosterone-poisoned adolescents when they found those photos on her phone.


3 posted on 09/07/2010 12:46:51 AM PDT by Ronin (If it were not so gruesomely malevolent, Islam would just be silly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

she’s a citizen....is this what we face?.....total tyranny by arrogant cops?.....are we already there?


4 posted on 09/07/2010 12:55:09 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
No mention of finding some text messages that back up their accusation of vandalism. Shouldn't have taken them long to research that. Hardly necessary for CSI Miami crime lab tech either as she said.

Definitely some donut scarfers here.

5 posted on 09/07/2010 12:56:00 AM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Sometimes it seems that way.


6 posted on 09/07/2010 12:59:39 AM PDT by Ronin (If it were not so gruesomely malevolent, Islam would just be silly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Cops wouldn’t do that... would they?

http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Cops-Sued-over-Pictures-of-a-Nude-Woman-Exhibition.html

http://www2.starexponent.com/news/2009/apr/19/nude_pics_have_police_in_hot_water-ar-337074/

http://globalgrind.com/channel/gossip/content/975213/COPS-SUSPENDED-OVER-RIHANNA-PHOTO/Controls/


7 posted on 09/07/2010 1:02:31 AM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

You can’t make this stuff up. We do indeed live in strange times.


8 posted on 09/07/2010 1:07:39 AM PDT by exnavy (May the Lord grant our troops protection and endurance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

Anyone dumb enough to keep a nude photo of oneself on a computer or cell phone should expect that somehow, at some time, the photo will be seen by someone not of one’s choosing. It’s not a matter of if, but when.


9 posted on 09/07/2010 1:12:34 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Noooo..... Cops? Breaking the law? Covering it up and abusing their powers?

Never!

/s


10 posted on 09/07/2010 1:22:34 AM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Welcome to "The Hunt for Red November".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
More likely one of her boy FRIENDS to whom she sent nude pictures would put them on the Internet than the cops..This women is a few sprinkles short of a cup cake..
11 posted on 09/07/2010 2:26:16 AM PDT by carcraft (Pray for our Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carcraft

“More likely one of her boy FRIENDS to whom she sent nude pictures would put them on the Internet than the cops..This women is a few sprinkles short of a cup cake.. “

That is irrelevant, and does not justify the cops’ behavior (if true)


12 posted on 09/07/2010 2:29:45 AM PDT by mainsail that ("A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights" - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

Deputy Police Chief Mark Turvey said none of his officers looked at Polaski’s pictures and that

What an idiot.
Like anyone is going to believe the cops did not look at the pics.
If you have nothing intelligent to say then just shut up...


13 posted on 09/07/2010 3:05:21 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
Looks like she was setting close to the air conditioner vent

14 posted on 09/07/2010 3:15:47 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
"After seizing the cell phone officers secured a search warrant..."

Shouldn't that be the other way around? How can one be considered "secure in their person and effects" when the police can seize one's personal effects without a warrant?

15 posted on 09/07/2010 3:29:59 AM PDT by meyer (Our own government has become our enemy,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

A stripper is worried about her reputation. That makes perfect sense. /s


16 posted on 09/07/2010 3:31:19 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (King: "I have a dream"...Sharpton: "I want a check")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

As much as we have been warned about the dangers of sexting, people are still doing it. Once the picture is sent out the sender no longer has control of it.


17 posted on 09/07/2010 4:16:46 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: giotto

That’s my view. When you allow a naked picture of yourself to be taken you have to expect that some time or other someone will view it .


18 posted on 09/07/2010 4:17:18 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

First they came for the strippers,

and I said nothing, etc.


19 posted on 09/07/2010 4:19:33 AM PDT by maine yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

She could vandalize a car just by washing it.


20 posted on 09/07/2010 4:38:50 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson