The great part- her picture featured in the paper was taken in a bar.
1 posted on
09/07/2010 12:39:45 AM PDT by
Krankor
To: Krankor
2 posted on
09/07/2010 12:43:19 AM PDT by
optiguy
(Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
To: Krankor
While this woman is obviously no saint, I would not put it past a bunch of cops to act like stupid testosterone-poisoned adolescents when they found those photos on her phone.
3 posted on
09/07/2010 12:46:51 AM PDT by
Ronin
(If it were not so gruesomely malevolent, Islam would just be silly.)
To: Krankor
No mention of finding some text messages that back up their accusation of vandalism. Shouldn't have taken them long to research that. Hardly necessary for CSI Miami crime lab tech either as she said.
Definitely some donut scarfers here.
5 posted on
09/07/2010 12:56:00 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
To: Krankor
You can’t make this stuff up. We do indeed live in strange times.
8 posted on
09/07/2010 1:07:39 AM PDT by
exnavy
(May the Lord grant our troops protection and endurance.)
To: Krankor
Anyone dumb enough to keep a nude photo of oneself on a computer or cell phone should expect that somehow, at some time, the photo will be seen by someone not of one’s choosing. It’s not a matter of if, but when.
9 posted on
09/07/2010 1:12:34 AM PDT by
giotto
To: Krankor
Deputy Police Chief Mark Turvey said none of his officers looked at Polaski’s pictures and that
What an idiot.
Like anyone is going to believe the cops did not look at the pics.
If you have nothing intelligent to say then just shut up...
To: Krankor
Looks like she was setting close to the air conditioner vent
14 posted on
09/07/2010 3:15:47 AM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: Krankor
"After seizing the cell phone officers secured a search warrant..."Shouldn't that be the other way around? How can one be considered "secure in their person and effects" when the police can seize one's personal effects without a warrant?
15 posted on
09/07/2010 3:29:59 AM PDT by
meyer
(Our own government has become our enemy,...)
To: Krankor
A stripper is worried about her reputation. That makes perfect sense. /s
16 posted on
09/07/2010 3:31:19 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(King: "I have a dream"...Sharpton: "I want a check")
To: Krankor
She could vandalize a car just by washing it.
20 posted on
09/07/2010 4:38:50 AM PDT by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: Krankor
Polaski, a former stripper and club manager, said she is also worried by the prospect of the photos being digitally altered in such a way that it appears she is engaged in some depraved act. "My daughter's 14. I'm concerned about that," Careers have consequences.
24 posted on
09/07/2010 5:36:50 AM PDT by
McGruff
(How's that Hopey Changey thingy workin for ya?)
To: Krankor
They are still holding the phone... because?
25 posted on
09/07/2010 10:38:31 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: Krankor
Even though Polaski faces no charges so far in connection with the Romeoville car vandalism investigation, she is fighting a pair of driving under the influence cases out of Joliet. One is from a felony arrest in June, the other a misdemeanor charge from March. No charges but still need to put some scandal in her profile. If she were to go to trial on this vandalism charge, the jury would not be informed of the other charges.
26 posted on
09/07/2010 10:40:58 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: Krankor
"Don't you people get it? It was the Phone Cops!"
27 posted on
09/07/2010 10:42:22 AM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson