Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NonValueAdded

It appears to be the microwave based technology. The radio-activity you are thinking about (X-rays) would require a emitter on the other side of the subject.

This simply looks through the first couple layers of the subject. Depending upon the energy behind the waves, these are no more harmful than your cell phone, calculator, laptop, PC, FM radio or high voltage transmission lines that criss-cross our country delivering power to every home in the USA.


10 posted on 08/26/2010 10:58:40 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar
It appears to be the microwave based technology. The radio-activity you are thinking about (X-rays) would require a emitter on the other side of the subject.

No, I based it on this from the excerpt: "the same backscatter x-ray scanner technology ..." and that doesn't sound like microwaves. I think you are thinking of the naughty-bits scanner for people and this is the technology for luggage and other inanimate objects. After all, we're not talking about a few layers of clothing but rather vehicle and truck bodies. I believe the backscatter sensing is what lets the emitter be in front and the receiver is reading reflections.

28 posted on 08/26/2010 12:14:16 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Obama suffers from decision-deficit disorder." Oliver North 6/25/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson