So you're not actually saying that you have evidence that the microfilm has been altered as part of this conspiracy, only that an old copy of the film was replaced by a newer copy. Is that right?
No, I’m saying that I have evidence that the microfilms have been altered. The “new copies” of the microfilms were obviously not made by professionals but by somebody not very good at making copies (lots of streaks, splotches, and fingerprints). And they weren’t made from clean master microfilm as libraries would get from a legitimate change-out of old microfilms, but apparently from used microfilms and/or microfiche in order to make it appear that they were old microfilms that had never been changed out.
One library gave out copies where what showed in the whole-page view wasn’t the same as what showed in a close-up of the same area. Really interesting stuff to try to sort out.
But until I can show the actual proof I suppose I should probably just keep quiet. lol