Skip to comments.
EXCLUSIVE: 'Fuming' Lindsay Lohan Wants Apology From Courts, Source Says
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/08/23/exclusive-fuming-lindsay-lohan-wants-apology-courts-cocaine-claims-source-says/ ^
Posted on 08/23/2010 11:04:21 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA
According to Lindsay Lohans latest medical report from UCLA, the actress was not addicted to cocaine as once suspected.
Instead, it is believed she was misdiagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorder and given the prescription drug Adderall, which may be to blame for triggering her often bizarre behavior.
Now Lohan apparently wants some form of apology or compensation from the courts.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: stillstuckonstupid; stupidpeople
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: exist
And here I thought she was flashing her privates in public because she was slutty.No, no, no...she suffers terribly from a textbook case of JED - Junk Exposure Disorder. Duh!
21
posted on
08/23/2010 11:55:51 AM PDT
by
opus86
To: FormerACLUmember
Addicts always blame someone else.Um, so do people who are innocent. You sound like you probably like witch tests also :-)
22
posted on
08/23/2010 11:58:56 AM PDT
by
krb
(Obama is a miserable failure.)
To: krb
You sound like you probably like witch tests also :-)Does she weigh less than a duck?
23
posted on
08/23/2010 12:01:07 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Red in Blue PA
So. She doesn't have ADD? Is it that she just doesn't give a crap about anything that doesn't start with the word "Lindsay"?
24
posted on
08/23/2010 12:05:23 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: dfwgator
25
posted on
08/23/2010 12:05:30 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: dfwgator
Since you brought up ducks:
Beware the Quantum Duck!
QUARK ! QUARK ! !
26
posted on
08/23/2010 12:05:41 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: Red in Blue PA
27
posted on
08/23/2010 12:08:53 PM PDT
by
maggief
To: Red in Blue PA
To: Red in Blue PA
Pound sand.
Rat’s ass.
‘Nuff said!
29
posted on
08/23/2010 12:27:04 PM PDT
by
pingman
(Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Well, she's making a claim with apparent medical backing, so it behooves us to treat it seriously: Courts in CA have been known to screw up before. Sure, experts can be bought but it's not certain that's what's happening here.
Or to put it another way, it doesn't cost us anything to give the woman a hearing.
30
posted on
08/23/2010 12:47:21 PM PDT
by
Grut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson