Posted on 08/20/2010 10:05:03 AM PDT by Keltik
Suprised the dogs weren’t killed also. That is the usual M.O.
No, if it was a black guy they’d be screwed.
Half way through the video, watch the poor little dog stand right in front of his owners head, as the officer is mashing this guys head into the concrete with his knee.
Wow...The little dog is doing what he can trying to help the dog owner by standing right in front of his head.
How messed up would it be if the dog tried to protect the owner and then they shot the dog!
Well, that is what the man is claiming occurred.
Watch the video, the man was up on the sidewalk and the cops walked over to him.
Stepping into the middle of it and basically inferring that the cops were lying was not a good plan.
Where are you seeing that?
That is not what I saw. I saw the cops walk up to the citizen who was standing on the sidewalk.
Well?
Actually a Federal Grand Jury should be convened to indict these cops under 18USC242. Google it up and learn how these cops could easily be sentenced to life terms.
A motorist was pulled over for allegedly failing to stop at a stop sign. Dog walker tells the motorist he saw them stop and will testify to that end...It then appears the cops walk up onto the sidewalk where dog walker is standing, and proceed to beat him into the ground.
I made a Word Doc that you can download and print to carry with you.
http://focusonthelaw.net/files/photo.doc
_______________________________________
I am a freelance photographer
I am exercising my 1st Amendment rights and any denial of those rights will be a violation of 42 USC Section 1983
I am a photographer, not a terrorist
My activity is protected by the United States Constitution.
I do not consent to any search of my camera, photos, bags, or self without a proper warrant.
If you are a police officer objecting to your picture being taken, your objection is hereby denied under USDC Robinson v. Fetterman.
All cops are thugs, ping.
I watched this and see that one of the ‘abusive’ cops is an older woman! She didn’t actually do anything. Just stood around while the other cop beat that guy. Also curious that the dogs didn’t even help the guy out!
Well done.
Geez the cop knees him in the nads....no reason for any of this, except that the cop is angry. I would like to know what the rest of their shift was like, and if he has any kids!
Actually, that is what the entire political class wants.
The hiring of thugs then giving them more pay than they would ever get in their lifetime doing anything they were actually capable of, and also giving them a free hand to satiate their thug egos by allowing them to terrorize the citizenry.
The politicians want to suppress the serfs (citizens) and making sure the police are corrupted into a brute squad furthers their agenda.
That was how it was reported verbally by the broadcaster.
Watch the little dog half way through the video, stand right in front of his owners face and his head is pushed into the concrete by the officers knee....The little dog didn't know what else to do...
It seems to be getting harder and harder to remain pro-law enforcement....
Idiot.
That is what the man is claiming occurred.
Watch the video, the man was up on the sidewalk and the cops walked over to him.
Stepping into the middle of it and basically inferring that the cops were lying was not a good plan.
Where are you seeing that?
That is not what I saw. I saw the cops walk up to the citizen who was standing on the sidewalk.
That was how it was reported verbally by the broadcaster.
You should watch the video.
The dog walker did not walk into the middle of anything. The cops walk towards the dog walker, who is clearly up on the sidewalk, and no where near a citizens receiving a ticket.
The beating was subsequent, and did not start until after that, when the cops clearly walked towards dog walker who was up on the sidewalk, when he was attacked.
Everyone on here needs to look up and be familiar with SAF.
DETENTION
The police are only allowed to detain citizens when there are “specific and articulable facts supporting suspicion” (SAF) that you are involved in criminal activity.
This means they can’t detain you on a “hunch.” They must have observed something about your behavior or character that links you with specific criminal activity. If you are detained without SAF, you are detained illegally. If this matter ever lands in court, you may be able to get off because the original detention on their part was illegal.
When you use terms like “detention” and “specific and articulable facts, the officer will usually back down a bit. The majority of a police officers power in the united states comes from intimidation and prey on the publics ignorance of its own rights.
It is crucial that you let the officer know that you are not consenting to talk with him and that the only way you will talk to him is if he detains you which he can not do without SAF.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.