Posted on 08/19/2010 11:17:21 AM PDT by Gargantua
1 Palin = 3 Obamas
The Publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Sherman Frederick, posted a piece on the LVRJ website this past Wednesday regarding Palin’s upcoming visit to the “Silver State” to stump for Sharon Angle, who finds herself in an ever-tightening race with Dingy Harry Reid.
In it, he makes a rather bold statement about the battle actually being pitched between Barrack Obama, who is backing Reid, and Sarah Palin’s support for Ms. Angle. Due to copyright considerations, I cannot quote the piece or give the website address (ever hear of Google?), but here is almost verbatim what Mr. Frederick said:
Regarding whose influence will be more effective with Nevada voters come November, one Obama equals three Palins. Said another way, for every voter that Barry succeeds in encouraging to back Harry, Sarah will probably get 3 or more into the booths for Sharon.
Sounds about right.
In fact, if anything, Mr. Frederick is being rather generous with Imam Hussein and his positives among the heartland’s lever-pullers.
The bottom line is that, despite the mewling spittle being strewn about by her incoherent attackers, Sarah Palin remains a political force in the heartland hearts of Americans unlike anything seen in decades. This country has the unlikely combination of Ronald Reagan and Joan of Arc in Sarah, and she serendipitously happens to have come along at the precise moment when this great but troubled Nation needs her the most.
Thank God for Sarah Palin.
You may want to pull your head from your rectal orifice prior to commenting on others. Have a pleasant day.
Well I know Nevadans. Palin is very popular in the North. 0 and Reid are very popular in Kalfegas. Reid only needs to carry the South and 20% in Washoe and 15% in three other counties to win. BTW Angle does not play so well in the South.
A brazen admission, indeed... given that she is who this thread is about. Try responding to the post, instead of diverting the focus to someone incidental to the thrust of the piece.
This thread could have named any pro-Palin publisher or editor in the country; he was incidental to the message--until you put all the focus on him. Strategic effectiveness isn't your strength, is it?
Good grief.
;-/
And you’re obviously the type who rather than admitting to misunderstanding my post continues to attack me. Around my vicinity we call those people dicks.
Enjoy your day. Jackass.
A comparable metaphor would be "cutting off one's nose to spite one's face." . My allusion being, all of the various forums, links and excerpts would increase readership to the daily in question. Why then, would an individual attack those who would put bread on his table?
If that escapes you, why you may want to join the remedial forum.
In the interest of returning the focus of this piece to Sarah Palin, this will be my last reply to your counterintuitive repeated insistence on bringing up The Forum The Name Of Which Cannot Be Spoken. If you really don't want attention drawn to this guy or his site, I'd suggest you give it a long overdue rest. You're acting like someone he paid to give him tons of publicity.
Kind of neat how Palin is compared as being 3-times as effective as O'Bunga, huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.