Posted on 08/13/2010 10:10:06 AM PDT by dselig
Your post 26, I couldn’t agree more. On ALL points.
Another Hollywoodenhead checks in.
Thank you, science for providing alternatives to fatherhood. And, of course, when the going gets tricky, and the kids prove to be a challenge, what then, Jen? Oh yeah, turn to science.
It’s testament to the actor’s lack of core that she - and so many others of her ilk -feel they have to live the part they portray on film. It’s no wonder they fail so miserably whenever they’re off script.
I guess I just don’t follow Hollywood as closely as they want me to. Didn’t know about the film. Now that I know, I don’t care. My Hollywood apathy card expired due to total lack of interest.
Miss Aniston’s comments may not even reflect her own personal viewpoint.
Candice Bergan argued the point with Dan Quayle (Republican) but later conceded that he was right.
Liberals lie.
” ... the “girl next door” look tends to age better ...”
That’s the physical attraction that most men instinctively have towards JA. But I suspect she defines the term “high maintenance.”
Hey that's not her fault, she just scares the men away before she get's a chance to get knocked up. Brad Pit stayed around long enough but somehow he managed to escape without having any kids with her. It's not like he doesn't like kids he has about 20 of them now!
Men see the forest, women see the trees. Both women are actresses, so what we see is only skin deep anyway.
Jennifer has never been much more than a one night stand. Maybe if she could keep a guy interested in her, she’d have more credibility.
Exactly. Well said.
I like that flare she’s wearing.
Perzactly! Plus, how many times have we heard this BS that having a child is punishment for young girls, that it is inconvenient at the time of the young unwed mother or of HER career (shoulda conveniently kept her legs together), that birthing the child is just too emotionally traumatic, yet murdering it is just a walk in the park...
And now they want to pull this BS about how good men are just hard to find and a woman shouldn’t be inconveniently encumbered with one so the best thing to do is deprive the child of the opportunity to have a loving father...
But it just seems to me, that maybe good women are getting rarer by the minute, especially in Bawdywood among the brainless hoochie coochie clones.
Ang is only 35 but she sure don’t look it. She’s got a lot of “old lady face”, very sunken cheeks, deep lines. Aniston is 6 years older but probably looks 5 years younger.
She’s a Hollywood person, most folks who seek fame, especially by pretending to be somebody else, tend to be high maintenance. It’s not really a profession that draws the sane.
The clock is ticking, and she won’t be beautiful forever.
Instead of realizing that "Prince Charming" only exists in fairy tales. Life is not a romance novel. Too few women seem to realize this.
No doubt. I always figured Brad Pitt had very good reasons for ditching her. As a friend in college once said, “No matter how hot she is, someone, somewhere is tired of putting up with her $h!+.”
Watch your back Jen, Ted Baxter has a loofah and he is not afraid to use it.
Watch your back Jen, Ted Baxter has a loofah and he is not afraid to use it.
She’s one of the most incredibly stupid people on the planet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.