[plinyelder]

"The only proper “restrictions” on firearms ownership should be restrictions on felons.."

Let's take this a step further.
If someone has served their time and served that time for a non-violent felony .. Does that mean that they no longer have the right to protect themselves .. or their loved ones? HMMM?

[patriot preacher]

“The only proper “restrictions” on firearms ownership should be restrictions on felons..”
Let’s take this a step further.
If someone has served their time and served that time for a non-violent felony .. Does that mean that they no longer have the right to protect themselves .. or their loved ones? HMMM?
_____________________

That’s a good question! I was speaking in general terms. Forgive my vagueness. I was referring to violent felonies — armed robberies, assaults, attempted murders, rapes, etc., NOT “non-violent” felonies as a general rule! thanks for letting me clarify.