1 posted on
08/11/2010 11:49:42 AM PDT by
decimon
To: neverdem; DvdMom; grey_whiskers
2 posted on
08/11/2010 11:50:37 AM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
True.
I developed my abs, 12 ounces at a time.
3 posted on
08/11/2010 11:50:44 AM PDT by
Tijeras_Slim
(Live jubtabulously!)
To: decimon
I always heard heavy weight + low reps builds bulk, while light weight + high reps builds definition.
4 posted on
08/11/2010 11:52:15 AM PDT by
Pessimist
To: decimon
nothing new there. all weight training and body building routines have low weight high rep segments.
To: decimon
The secret is to pump iron until you reach muscle fatigueWow. What a breakthrough. /sarc
6 posted on
08/11/2010 11:55:11 AM PDT by
pogo101
To: decimon
This is considered new? We were always taught that you build mass through heavy weight and stamina and definition with high reps of lighter weight. Why do they consider this news?
To: decimon
The principle that guides all exercise physiology is SAID.
Specific
Adaptation to
Imposed
Demand
Higher reps & lighter weights is a different (neuromuscular) adaptation than the demand imposed by heavier weight.
Exercise Phy. 101
12 posted on
08/11/2010 12:05:36 PM PDT by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: decimon
There are different types of muscle fibre that do different things.
You need a combination of low reps and high reps to build both.
Any gym rat could tell them this.
13 posted on
08/11/2010 12:08:25 PM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: decimon
The best book i ever had on weightlifting said to lift doing as many reptitions as it took to FAIL.
If it was 50 pounds for 100 reps, or 150 pounds for 3 reps- the important part was to REACH the point where you fail.
I bulked up so fast I couldnt believe it. And I lost weight- even though I was usually starving to death after a workout like that.
Finally made it to be able to bench over 250 in less than 6 months
15 posted on
08/11/2010 12:15:06 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to proofreed (<---oops! see?))
To: decimon
This has been known for many, many years. It is why there are BODYBUILDERS and POWERLIFTERS, not necessarily the same thing. The muscle grows in response to how much you tax it. Maximal weight without significant taxing of the energy system (reps) will get you strong, but the muscle will not grow as much as if you taxed it with reps. Adding the "reps" component of the set will cause the muscle to increase its glycogen stores for energy, and with this energy comes alot of water, which swells up the muscle cell, yadda yadda, the mechanisms have been known for a while, I guess this study is one of the ones that simply confirms what alot of people have suspected for a while.
Here's something to think about, while I was no where as built as The Rock (Duane Johnson), I could out bench him back in... well it must have been about 8 years ago. He told me he trains solely for muscular endurance and size, and didn't lift very heavy weights any more. His physique still made me look small however..
16 posted on
08/11/2010 12:15:32 PM PDT by
Paradox
(Socialism - trickle up poverty.)
To: decimon
Arthur Jones proved this in the 70s. This is nothing new.
That being said, strength gains will be minimal on this kind of routine due to the lack of tension.
Muscle size will increase, but it will be hollow muscle, rather than the more dense muscle that results from higher weights.
To: decimon
Careful, don’t gain too much muscle or you will be considered OBESE on the idiot government BMI.
21 posted on
08/11/2010 1:00:51 PM PDT by
Newtoidaho
(Liberals are drooling buffoons backed by satanic goons.)
To: decimon
12-oz.-curls ping

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
23 posted on
08/11/2010 1:58:18 PM PDT by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: decimon
Your body is extremely adaptable. You need to change up your routine to continue the hypertrophy cycle.
Short reps, max weight. Cycle to low weight, high reps. Cycle to moderate weight, moderate reps.
Depends on what you are trying to do.
I used to work in 100 rep sets every now and then when I found I was no longer hitting that "pumped" feeling from my normal routines.
100 reps doesn't sound like much, but try it for something like "good mornings" or squats and you'll see what I mean.
27 posted on
08/11/2010 2:18:47 PM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(III, Alarm and Muster)
To: decimon
Troy Polamalu claims never to lift more than 20lbs. Here is one of the interviews of his workout regiment.
troy polamalu workout
The Madden curse aside, he is a monster on the field and in on every play in every direction.
30 posted on
08/11/2010 4:07:44 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media. There are Wars and Rumors of War.)
To: decimon; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; ...
If it’s about reps, maybe I should get a mouse for the other hand as well...
32 posted on
08/11/2010 4:43:40 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson