The phto of the 110 is funny. The Brits didn’t score anything of worth. The Me 11o was a pig. When they weren’t flying in a “circle up the wagons” formation in an effort to survive British fighters, they had to be escorted by Me 109s.
I don't think that is a problem for the Times. Their mission (just guessing) is to build support in the U.S. for the British and to convince Americans that teaming up with them will put us on the winning side. That will improve the chances of Congress allowing FDR to send aid to the British. For example 50 old, useless World War era destroyers (that are just sitting around getting rusty, anyhow, so what's the big deal?).
Interesting that the reporters a getting a little more savvy about the aircraft they are describing. A couple months ago I don't think they new the difference between bombers and fighters. In a couple more months they will probably be making the same points about the ME 110 that you made in your reply.