To: SWAMPSNIPER
I’ve got a similar SLR Canon from about the same era, gathering dust. I don’t know where I would find a battery or film for it. Great in its time.
To: DeFault User
This one uses 2 of the little LR-44 batteries, they are all over the place. If you do a search on camera batteries most of the old ones are still available. Film is easy to find, they'll be making it for a long time yet.
I'm thinking of saving up a few bucks and getting a scanner, some of them will handle 35mm and slides. There are places that will develop your film and put it on discs and the price isn't bad if you don't get carried away.
16 posted on
07/29/2010 8:59:12 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
To: DeFault User
Ive got a similar SLR Canon from about the same era, gathering dust. I dont know where I would find a battery or film for it. Great in its time. Ditto here. IIRC it cost nearly $300 when it was new, not including lenses.
25 posted on
07/29/2010 9:18:39 PM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
To: DeFault User
I bought my Canon AE-1 in 1978 and have several lens’ for it. I have taken several thousand pics with it at various places around the world. I still occasionally use it. It is still a great camera.
38 posted on
07/29/2010 9:34:30 PM PDT by
GGpaX4DumpedTea
(I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
To: DeFault User
Batteries are standardized. You can dust it off and get it working in a flash. No reason put off developing your skills again.
107 posted on
07/30/2010 2:10:32 PM PDT by
lefty-lie-spy
(Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/ - via iPhone from Tokyo.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson