This is the second or third post about a question and I don’t see one in the post. It’s annoying. You think you are a conservative but you are making pro-Romney posts in 2007 with everyone still in the race. There is nothing good to say about Romney. He is socially not a conservative. He is fiscally not a conservative. Nothing there for a conservative voter.
And you are parroting the main stream media in your attacks on Palin and don’t seem to be able to see yourself doing it. You know the attacks were coordinated in part by the Journolistas and now Cabal . . . but you don’t stop and think.
I will figure you are blind so... I will repeat it.
If Romney would win the nomination, will you vote for him?
or will you vote for Obama, or not at all which means Obama wins.
At that point in time in 2007 Hunter was not getting any traction, he couldn’t get the media to even let him speak in a debate. He was who I was for. Rudy, who I didn’t like was tanking hanging around in Fla, Huck was pulling his usual Huckabaloney, McLame, of McCain Feingold and McCain Kennedy fame looked to be out of it and I despise him. Fred got in late and wasn’t really serious. Many of his supporters were angry about that later right here on FR. Who was left? Romney. He was the only one of those rotten apples that mentioned illegal immigration is the debates other than Duncan Hunter. At that point in time we had just been through the CIR battle. That was the top issue for me. Still is.
So...I wasn’t going to not vote...so like many others I was picking through the barrel of rotten apples. I would have gladly voted for the only conservative in the race, that being Hunter, but people around here didn’t think he was flashy enough and the GOP head honchos didn’t want a conservtive to win. They probably still don’t.
And after all this kerfuffel, if Palin gets the nomination in 2012, she will get my vote.