Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

Nothing at all states the bizarre interpretation of “natural born citizen” meaning “...you can be a citizen and your parents can be foreign born, and you qualify as a citizen under the 14th Amendment, but one or both parents was not a citizen at the time you were born...and you still won’t be a natural born citizen, even if you don’t require a nationalization process (as opposed to being natural BORN)? But if your parents are citizens, you and your parents can all be foreign born, and you’ll still qualify as natural born?

Did I get that right?


148 posted on 07/21/2010 5:19:21 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
Nothing at all states the bizarre interpretation of “natural born citizen” meaning “...you can be a citizen and your parents can be foreign born, and you qualify as a citizen under the 14th Amendment,

There is nothing "bizarre" about it. That's not just a "citizen" but a 'natural born citizen.' It has been universally accepted over human generations that spans Millenniums. And the 14th Amendment does not change the meaning and intent of the natural born citizen clause in Article 2 of the US Constitution.

150 posted on 07/21/2010 5:30:34 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: Gondring
Did I get that right?

No.

153 posted on 07/21/2010 5:33:24 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson