[mlo]

Attacking other freepers does nothing to advance your arguments. In fact, it’s the sign of a losing argument.

[tired_old_conservative]

“Attacking other freepers does nothing to advance your arguments. In fact, it’s the sign of a losing argument.”

It isn't losing in court, where our old friend reality intrudes. And I believe it is the birther-bots and you who started attacking on this thread.

But by all means, tell us why you think the Supreme Court will regard Orly's brief, the subject of this thread, as anything other than the obvious joke it is?

[ml/nj]

Attacking other freepers does nothing to advance your arguments. In fact, it’s the sign of a losing argument.

If it's an "attack" to point out that someone only posts on eligibility threads, and to point out that the questions I asked weren't addressed, then I guess I'm guilty. I wonder if you thought what I wrote about "standing" in response to the FRaudster was without merit? I wonder if you think suggesting that the eligibility issue be decided by a court on the merits is without merit.

ML/NJ