Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
How about the part where she threatens the Supreme Court

I guess when I was asking as I did, I was really hoping for specific quotes and not further generalizations.

ML/NJ

81 posted on 07/09/2010 11:53:39 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj

From page 17.

“If this court does not reverse such sanctions and
does not order an independent investigation, this court will be guilty of aiding and abetting all of
the felonies committed by Obama. This court will be guilty of misprision of multiple felonies.”


89 posted on 07/09/2010 1:35:51 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj
I guess when I was asking as I did, I was really hoping for specific quotes and not further generalizations.

I was thinking of this sentence from her brief: "If this court does not reverse such sanctions and does not order an independent investigation, this court will be guilty of aiding and abetting all of the felonies committed by Obama. This court will be guilty of misprision of multiple felonies."

Threatening the Supreme Court with criminal prosecution is not likely to get them all excited to hear your case, especially when your appeal is from an order imposing sanctions on you for accusing the trial judge of "treason.".

103 posted on 07/09/2010 3:34:54 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson