Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NavyCanDo
Seriously, and with no offense to the LDS Freepers, I put my trust in the historians and ethnographers who agree that Linguistically, they are part of the Iroquoian-language family and are thought to have migrated south in ancient times from the Great Lakes region, where other Iroquoian-speaking peoples were located.

Language is not a reliable marker of ethnic origin, since a new language is easily learned, and an old language forgotten within two or three generations. Think of all the American immigrant families and their grandchildren and great-grandchildren, who couldn't speak more than a word or two of the “old” language if a gun was held to their heads, having learned only English.
16 posted on 07/07/2010 7:15:25 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Stephen Decatur: you want barrels of gunpowder as tribute, you must expect cannonballs with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Cheburashka
Language is not a reliable marker of ethnic origin, since a new language is easily learned, and an old language forgotten within two or three generations.

So language is NOT a good indicator of heredity.

54 posted on 07/07/2010 11:04:20 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson