Skip to comments.
‘Star Trek' franchise an homage to humanist philosophy
Worcester (MA) Telegram ^
| 06/29/2010
| Bronislaus B. Kush
Posted on 06/30/2010 9:05:26 AM PDT by iowamark
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: iowamark
Just because one is a 'fan' of a genre, doesn't mean one subscribes to either the author's personal philosophy, or the philosophy of the genre in general.
I'd never heard about Gene Roddenberry's beliefs, but I was clear about those of Joseph Campbell, from whom George Lucas borrowed philosophical ideas when he was writing his Star Wars movies. Just because I thought the shows were entertaining doesn't mean I subscribe to the beliefs of their creators.
41
posted on
06/30/2010 10:43:42 AM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Sans-Culotte
I remember an episode from the Original Series in which a people worshiped The Sun; but it was revealed at episodes end to be The Son (of God). Also, the characters constantly make references to God My God, Man!, Oh, my God, etc. There was in "interfaith" chapel aboard the original NCC-1701 (seen briefly at the beginning of Balance of Terror). All the original series' subtle religious references (ex.: "A Pearl of Great Price", etc.) are fairly well cataloged in an out-of-print book titled "Star Trek: The Good News In Modern Images". Online reviews refer to the author's approach as "Christianity Lite, blended with Jungian Pop Psychology". From what I recall, that's a pretty fair summation.
The things you find in a university library when you're supposed to be studying for a calculus exam...
42
posted on
06/30/2010 10:55:34 AM PDT
by
Charles Martel
("Endeavor to persevere...")
To: Above My Pay Grade
Of course. I had forgotten about that one.
43
posted on
06/30/2010 11:13:49 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Just say NO to conservativecave.com, it rots your teeth!)
To: C19fan
Voyager was uber poop. The only thing that could have truly saved that series (and its credibility) was janeway’s quick and irrelivant death in a permanent and can never come back fashion.
44
posted on
06/30/2010 12:05:59 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Charles Martel
she conveniently forgets “Bread and Circuses” and those pesky son worshipers...
45
posted on
06/30/2010 12:09:33 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: iowamark
46
posted on
06/30/2010 12:20:25 PM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
To: longtermmemmory
The fact that she got involved with Roddenberry in the 70s made me think. It was obvious that something drove him over the edge between the end of the original series and when he wrote The Motion Picture, but I always figured it was Vietnam.
To: The Pack Knight
the motion picture was the last major effort roddenbury devoted to trek. people see what they want to see.
less PC= better ratings.
shepard smith even reported that some fan were making “alternative lifestyle” versions of treak in fan productions on the internet. (btw some of them are not terrible)
48
posted on
06/30/2010 3:41:34 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: GOP_Raider
49
posted on
06/30/2010 5:31:54 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson