Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Star Trek' franchise an homage to humanist philosophy
Worcester (MA) Telegram ^ | 06/29/2010 | Bronislaus B. Kush

Posted on 06/30/2010 9:05:26 AM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: iowamark
Just because one is a 'fan' of a genre, doesn't mean one subscribes to either the author's personal philosophy, or the philosophy of the genre in general.

I'd never heard about Gene Roddenberry's beliefs, but I was clear about those of Joseph Campbell, from whom George Lucas borrowed philosophical ideas when he was writing his Star Wars movies. Just because I thought the shows were entertaining doesn't mean I subscribe to the beliefs of their creators.

41 posted on 06/30/2010 10:43:42 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
I remember an episode from the Original Series in which a people worshiped “The Sun”; but it was revealed at episode’s end to be “The Son” (of God). Also, the characters constantly make references to God “My God, Man!”, “Oh, my God”, etc.

There was in "interfaith" chapel aboard the original NCC-1701 (seen briefly at the beginning of Balance of Terror). All the original series' subtle religious references (ex.: "A Pearl of Great Price", etc.) are fairly well cataloged in an out-of-print book titled "Star Trek: The Good News In Modern Images". Online reviews refer to the author's approach as "Christianity Lite, blended with Jungian Pop Psychology". From what I recall, that's a pretty fair summation.

The things you find in a university library when you're supposed to be studying for a calculus exam...

42 posted on 06/30/2010 10:55:34 AM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Of course. I had forgotten about that one.


43 posted on 06/30/2010 11:13:49 AM PDT by GeronL (Just say NO to conservativecave.com, it rots your teeth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Voyager was uber poop. The only thing that could have truly saved that series (and its credibility) was janeway’s quick and irrelivant death in a permanent and can never come back fashion.


44 posted on 06/30/2010 12:05:59 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

she conveniently forgets “Bread and Circuses” and those pesky son worshipers...


45 posted on 06/30/2010 12:09:33 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

46 posted on 06/30/2010 12:20:25 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The fact that she got involved with Roddenberry in the 70s made me think. It was obvious that something drove him over the edge between the end of the original series and when he wrote The Motion Picture, but I always figured it was Vietnam.
47 posted on 06/30/2010 1:51:07 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

the motion picture was the last major effort roddenbury devoted to trek. people see what they want to see.

less PC= better ratings.

shepard smith even reported that some fan were making “alternative lifestyle” versions of treak in fan productions on the internet. (btw some of them are not terrible)


48 posted on 06/30/2010 3:41:34 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Raider

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJGvn5iOERM


49 posted on 06/30/2010 5:31:54 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson