Once again, we have you reposting already REFUTED and proved wrong information. You were told this, with links, in a previous instance where you posted it. WHY do you post the same mis-information again?
That was posted over a year ago... and it had not been posted as a major issue again. Do you think that if it were Apple's policy to issue refunds and to charge back the full 100% to the developers there wouldn't be a bigger hullaballoo than just a few articles? Even in the discussion on that article developers chimed in to say that THEY were credited 70% when the sale was made... and debited 70% when a refund was made. REFUTING the allegations made by someone with an axe to grind.
Although the clause does say that Apple retains the right to keep the 30%, it also says Apple "may" issue the consumer the refund and that that keeping the 30% is linked to the reason the refund is issued:
"...a Licensed Application fails to conform to Your specifications or Your product warranty or the requirements of any applicable law, Apple may refund to the end-user the full amount of the price paid by the end-user for that Licensed Application. In the event that Apple refunds any such price to an end-user, You shall reimburse, or grant Apple a credit for, an amount equal to the price for that Licensed Application. Apple will have the right to retain its commission on the sale of that Licensed Application, notwithstanding the refund of the price to the end."
So far there are very few developers who have complained that Apple has retained the 30%... and many who have said they haven't.
OK, before you start your rant:
I NEVER SAID THAT BEFORE. This is the FIRST time I’ve seen this story. Go shoot your wad at someone else because IT’S NOT ME.
So quit jumping down my throat. You got a problem with what I posted? Then post other information. Otherwise take a deep breath and chill.
This was a nice calm thread until you came in...
So I await your apology.