Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Need help with an investment / real estate issue
Self | 6-28-2010 | Self

Posted on 06/28/2010 7:07:58 AM PDT by Gordon Pym

After a very long search I have been offered a job in southern CT. I'm nowin the process of finding a place to live down there but I am arguing with members of my family about the merits of buying a large house from a distressed buyer at a discount price (more than we need but they argue "a good investment") or a smaller house for very short money perhaps even for cash to reduce housing cost as much as possible.

The argument seems to come down to the following:

a large house will sell for more than a small one 10 years down the road so the difference between purchase and sale prices will be much more so it will be a better investment.

A small house will reduce costs the most so it will be the most prudent use of money. The additional money that would be tied up in the big house could be put into another tax deferred investment and would be more accessable should it be needed in the future. Housing is a cost not an investment.

I keep hitting a wall of stories of people who bought a house forty years ago and sold for five times what they paid. My contention is that when the high property taxes are factored in any gains would be offset But that doesn't seem to have an effect and I aam out of ideas

Help.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: homes; houseprices; houses; housing; investment; propertytax; realestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2010 7:08:02 AM PDT by Gordon Pym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

I’d go short and find a home that I love with potential down the road per location. You will find some great deals. Good luck!


2 posted on 06/28/2010 7:10:00 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym
You answered your own question: A small house will reduce costs the most so it will be the most prudent use of money.
3 posted on 06/28/2010 7:10:36 AM PDT by TSgt (We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym
bought a house forty years ago and sold for five times what they paid.

Those days are gone forever; lessons learned both economically and by politicians. Go small.

4 posted on 06/28/2010 7:13:14 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (It's not the Obama Administration....it's the "Obama Regime".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

I think you are near a bottom in the housing market. An investment in real estate may prove to be a good investment.

However, your holdings should be diversified. You should get the smaller house, if the maintencace of the larger house will result in your not being able to save - i.e., diversify your investments.


5 posted on 06/28/2010 7:14:32 AM PDT by frithguild (I gave to Joe Wilson the day after, to Scott Brown seven days before and next to JD Hayworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

Be sure to factor in larger taxes, maintenance and utilities for ten years into your math.


6 posted on 06/28/2010 7:14:36 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

Good luck with the new job. As for the home purchase situation, since you are going to CT, I’d recommend renting for at least 6 months to get the lay of the real estate situation there. Property taxes are exorbitant, according to friends of mine who escaped CT to VA last year.

Further, I don’t know what city you’re going to, but extra care should be given to whether the property you buy is even remotely being considered for an eminent domain taking. As we all learned from the Kelo decision, your property is fair game for the locals.


7 posted on 06/28/2010 7:14:58 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym
1. Buy the smallest house in the best location possible
2. Maximize your land purchase within reason (consider taxes and utility of the land).
8 posted on 06/28/2010 7:16:57 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

Agreed. I am amazed at some people on FR including military types. The world changed in 2008. We may never see America circa 2007 and earlier again. People are talking about the F-22 and F-35 like it matters anymore. I guess they just live in TV dreamland. Keep paying for cable and sat TV because that money and your viewership support your slavery.

CT has $80 billion in unfunded liabilities (cushy pensions/benefits for state workers) and 3.5 million residents. Who is going to pay for that?


9 posted on 06/28/2010 7:17:08 AM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

1. you left out cost of energy for a big house
2. more purchasers in future for small house than large house
3. why not look for rental house for short term?
4. IMHO, short term house prices down another 25%, then inflation like 70s will be used to resolve debt crisis.


10 posted on 06/28/2010 7:17:34 AM PDT by updatedscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym
a large house will sell for more than a small one 10 years down the road so the difference between purchase and sale prices will be much more so it will be a better investment.

Your statement assumes a real recovery. Even if the kenyan is defeated in 2012, it'll take awhile for the economy to recover, and that's assuming the GOP has the guts to repeal Obamanomics. From a neophite real estate owner from CT: Many of those Mcmansions built 5 years ago are now selling at 1/2 their initial price and the owners still can't unload them. Don't forget the property taxes. IMHO, purchace a well built starter home. They don't cost as much, taxes are lower and they'll always be a market for them.

11 posted on 06/28/2010 7:20:34 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

Let me just ask one question.
Do you like working on and around your house ?
The bigger the house/property , the more work / cost to maintain it. For example , I just spent the WEEKEND trimming bushes around my home. Bigger houses also cost more to heat/cool , paint, roof, mow the lawn(I have a $3500 riding mower, a $350 chain saw, a $300 hedge trimmer, a $300 string trimmer, a $300 walk behind mower, two snow blowers, plus rakes, shovels,ladders, etc.)
Therefore, if you would rather play golf or go to your boat,go skiing in the winter, etc. Buy a smaller house.


12 posted on 06/28/2010 7:21:09 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

The baby boom is over. This is particularly important in a high tax state that is a net looser in population. As they loose more taxpayers where will the get the money to keep services equal? If you feel that real estate is horribly undervalued, then proceed as stated; buy big, sell big. If real estate is not done adjusting down, then it would be best to wait. Note, new home sales were down 33% last month. This was caused by the tax credit for home buyers ending. My suggestion, given that 33% drop, would be to wait another 6 to 9 months before you buy anything. The subsidized home market ended 2 months ago, what does the un-subsidize housing market look like? We don’t know. Adopt a wait and see position, my recommendation.


13 posted on 06/28/2010 7:21:46 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb

The other thing I forgot to mention, I don’t know what business you’re in, but unless you work for the government, at some point you will almost certainly face a loss of income. Your taxes however will steadily go up. Another argument to go small.


14 posted on 06/28/2010 7:24:14 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym
Are you certain you will be in CT ten years from now?

People who talk about buying a home as an “investment” are stuck in the past, days that may never come back- and these are mostly the same people who voted for CHANGE- ha

Who IS going to be living in CT ten years from now and what are their incomes going to be and how will they be earning them? Demographics and marxist economics suggest a lot of wealthy corporate CT homeowners who are either boomers or moving into boomer years won't be around in 10 years, commuting to Wall Street from manicured tract mansions in CT.

And a lot more may be defaulting on their mortgages in the next 3 years when the tax-loving democrats get their hands on their bonuses, salaries, and 401K’s

The real estate market hasn't bottomed out yet- think 1990 prices or lower as a “good deal”

I'd be verry conservative and go with a smaller but quality home in the best school district and safest town you can afford- something you can rent out if you ever have to

15 posted on 06/28/2010 7:25:42 AM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

We live in a townhome and pay $50/month for yard and common area maintenance, and it includes a pool. The enjoyment of yard work is way over-rated.


16 posted on 06/28/2010 7:25:59 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

location, location, location. Buy the home that offers the best value for the price, and whichever one you can most comfortably afford. Do schools play a role in your decision? Also take into account, neighborhood stability and the amenities in proximity. I would check out the shopping areas and parks/recreation areas near both houses, and assess the clientele as well.


17 posted on 06/28/2010 7:26:35 AM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym

I live in a State much like CT (NY).

My house is not an investment. It is a joint-venture with the Gov’t.

We have very high property and school taxes. We have little price appreciation over the last 10 years. Upstate NY is losing people steadily as there are few new jobs in the area. Add in maintenence and repairs, and its a money-loser.


18 posted on 06/28/2010 7:29:32 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie; updatedscreenname

You guys replying to the right FReeper?

I’m for the smaller house.

With lots of land. ;-)


19 posted on 06/28/2010 7:30:01 AM PDT by TSgt (We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gordon Pym
Get the biggest house you can afford, then you and the wifey can work part-time at Walmart to help pay the Ct Taxes, and heating bills.

It'll workout fine, don't listen to the naysayers.

Disclaimer:This comment is based on my guess that you probably won't listen to any of the other good advice given anyway.

20 posted on 06/28/2010 7:31:08 AM PDT by gitmogrunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson