I looked at the preview available at Amazon some time ago and saw no footnotes. You really are a bit harsh aren't you? I said "apparently" which should have indicated to a native English speaker that I hadn't actually seen the book.
ML/NJ
So you haven’t actually read the book, but you feel no hesitation in labeling it “sugar coated.” I guess that between the options I listed before I’ll go with the former.
Funny thing, I had no trouble at all finding the footnotes on the Amazon preview. You remind me of a man who opens a Bible to one page, doesn't see the Ten Commandments on them and announces that they are nowhere to be found in the book.