Posted on 06/11/2010 11:39:52 AM PDT by RC one
Personal responsibility just got thrown out the window again thanks to a nanny state congressman with hopes of saving ourselves and others from you guessed it us!
Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.) on Thursday, June 10, successfully attached an amendment to the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010 that would authorize $8 million in annual funding for five years for the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) program.
The DADSS technology proposed in the ROADS SAFE amendment will likely lead to alcohol-sensing devices becoming mandatory factory-installed equipment on all automobiles within the next five-to-ten years, reports a Dallas, Texas CBS News affiliate.
Several devices are being tested, including skin sensors, CBS-11 revealed. Just by touching the steering wheel or gear shift, the vehicle could conceivably determine the drivers blood-alcohol level. Other ideas include installing sensors above the drivers head or head rest that could test perspiration and breath samples.
It probably will not surprise anyone to learn that federally subsidized and bailed-out General Motors is a chief supporter of the overbearing and intrusive Sarbanes amendment.
The American Beverage Institute (ABI), which represents over 8,000 American restaurants, is actively lobbying against the Sarbanes attempt to mandate alcohol detection devices in automobiles. A strong proponent of hundreds of pieces of legislation to apprehend drunk drivers, increase penalties for those convicted, and continue to search for innovative new ways to combat the problem, ABI expressed strong concern about developers of the devices intentionally designing them to render almost all drivers whove consumed a glass of wine or beer over the limit.
For legal, liability, and even physiological reasons, in-car alcohol detectors would have to be set below the legal limit most likely around 0.03-0.04. The head of the research project that this bill seeks to fund has even admitted that the devices would be set below the legal limit, an ABI press release states. This would effectively eliminate Americans ability to have a glass of wine with dinner, a beer at a ball game, or a champagne toast at a wedding and drive home.
ABI Managing Director Sarah Longwell noted that countless responsible drivers would be unable to start their cars if Sarbanes proposed alcohol sensors became standard equipment, especially if theyre pre-set to levels well below the legal drinking blood alcohol level.
Everyone opposes drunk driving, but putting alcohol detectors in all cars as standard equipmentset well below .08would make all driving Americans guilty until proven innocent every time they started their cars, Longwell said. Alcohol detection technology is a great way to keep hard core drunk driversthose who cause the vast majority of alcohol-impaired fatalitiesfrom being able to start their cars while drunk. But we shouldnt be developing this technology with the aim of putting it in everyones car.
“Several devices are being tested, including skin sensors, CBS-11 revealed. Just by touching the steering wheel or gear shift, the vehicle could conceivably determine the drivers blood-alcohol level. Other ideas include installing sensors above the drivers head or head rest that could test perspiration and breath samples.”
Have these idiots ever heard of GLOVES and maybe a bag or piece of tape over the other sensors.
Some years ago, the Federal Railroad Administration cdame up with the brilliant idea of requiring dead man springs in every locomotive; after the alarm prompted, the spring switch had to be swatted or the train would go into emergency. It took maybe fifteen minutes for every engineer in the country to figure out he could tie a bootlace from the spring to the windshield wiper.
Time for drunks against mad mothers to organize!!!
It’s only teenage wasteland. Teenage wasteland. Teenage wasteland. They’re all wasted!
Well, when the government promotes their semi-annual swine flu paranoia campaign, most people end up washing their hands in jelled alcohol...

I am IN!
Good Example! ... of liberal idiocy. Let the free market and the common sense of citizens decide who wants such a device.
Obviously, this doesn't apply to those with multiple drunk driving convictions. But under this idiotic proposal, your mouthwash could make you late for work, or late to drive your wife to the hospital, etc.
Liberal meddling KILLS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.