Posted on 06/07/2010 6:30:50 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
Guilty.
One word comes to mind. Meth.
How fulfilling did she think the relationship with a transgender would be?
/johnny
They perps look like they were tweaking some kind of drugs. Then they throw in her having a transgender husband. I don’t even know what that is, but she certainly had the option of a divorce. I guess it’s only a matter of time before they get invitations from Jerry Springer.
GEEZ at least bring blankets and find a place a little more private!
Well, just asking, but couldn’t she have “L” sex with her “LGBT” capital “T husband?
And, although she looks sorta guilty in that photo, I could see where she might have been a not guilty 20 years ago.
ping
my ex lived in Batavia and let me tell you when I stayed up there that sort of thing was common place. The place was a liberal utopia. Everyone and his mother on food stamps, no jobs besides drug dealing, crippling taxes, and more “lgbt” than I thought was possible in such a small area. Made Massachusetts seem like a randian paradise.
Suffice to say when she wouldn’t leave with me the relationship went sour real quick.
With drugs, it could be as recent as a year ago.
Ridden hard and put up wet too often.
I lived in Batavia not long ago. It’s a quiet little middle of nowhere city of farmers, where such rank public lewdness coupled with transgender (aka voluntary genital mutilation) issues is so far “out there” it doesn’t even count as fringe. It’s the kind of place where living there 10 years counts as “newcomer”, where “conservative” is left of center.
Dang, that story is just freaky for the area.
We talking about the same city? Could be, I was on the outside (Stafford). Above was my perception.
We don’t need a picture to see what a dog she likely is.
Every single thread that involves public sex or public indecency involves people who SHOULDN’T be doing it in public.
This thread is NOT useless without pictures.....
Forgive me for asking yet what the hell does your post have to do with: acorn; aliens; antisemitism; banglist; bho44; bp; chat; congress; copyrightlist; corona; corruption; democrats; donate; economy; elections; energy; flotilla; freeperbookclub; gaza; globaljihad; globalwarming; healthcare; helenthomas; islam; israel; kagantruthfile; napl; naturalborncitizen; notnews; obama; oil; oilspill; palin; pravdamedia; prayer; prolife; rally; recession; sarahpalin; scotus; statesrights; suzanne; talkradio; taxes; teaparty; teapartyexpress; teapartyrebellion; turkey; walterreed; wob; or wot? (If you check, you will figure out the three keywords that I removed.)
They still have a law on the books about adultery?
That was what leapt to mind for me too. All they need to do is add a goat to the mix and they'll be on during sweeps week to boot.
Who added all of the extra useless key words?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.