Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Spelling Bee protests: Should we simplify English spelling?
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 4 June 2010 | Eoin O'Carroll

Posted on 06/04/2010 8:50:41 PM PDT by James C. Bennett

The Scripps National Spelling Bee highlights what a mess the English spelling is – a hodgepodge of orthographies borrowed from German, French, Greek, and Latin. Is it time for a makeover?

The Irish playwright George Bernard Shaw is said to have joked that the word "fish" could legitimately be spelled "ghoti," by using the "gh" sound from "enough," the "o" sound from "women," and the "ti" sound from "action."

Shaw was probably not the originator of this joke, but he was one of a long line of people who thought that the English language's anarchic spelling, a hodgepodge of Germanic, French, Greek, and Latin, was desperately in need of reform.

To this end, he willed a portion of his estate toward the development of a new phonetic script. The result was the Shavian alphabet, whose 47 letters have a one-to-one phonetic correspondence with sounds in the English language. Like just about every other attempt to rein in English spelling, Shaw's alphabet continues to be widely ignored to this day.

But spelling-reform advocates press on. The Associated Press reported that this year's Scripps National Spelling Bee was picketed by four protesters, some dressed in bee costumes, who distributed buttons reading "Enuf is enuf. Enough is too much."

The demonstrators were from the the American Literacy Council and the London-based Spelling Society, organizations that aim to do to English orthography what the metric system did for weights and measures. The American Literacy Council endorses SoundSpel, which seeks to "rationalize" the English language by spelling each of the English language's 42 (or so) phonemes one way and one way only. In SoundSpel, "business" becomes "bizness," "equation" becomes "ecwaezhun," "learned" becomes "lernd," "negotiate" becomes "negoesheaet," and so on.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: education; literacy; ohio; protests; spellcheck; spelling; spellingbee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: Xenalyte
Xena, where Tax-chick had had “has had,” had had “had had”; “had had” had had both the teacher’s and SAJ’s approval.

Don't you want to put something more in this? Something seems missing in the red part below. (Unless someone's name is "had," and you have chosen to not use an upper case "h" in that name.)

Xena, where Tax-chick had had “has had,” had had “had had”; “had had” had had both the teacher’s and SAJ’s approval.

81 posted on 06/05/2010 10:01:34 AM PDT by bannie (Gone to seed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bannie

Take out the commas and everything between them. That should make sense.


82 posted on 06/05/2010 10:15:14 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Yes, Chef!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

“If that constitutes ‘progress’ to you, so be it. Hate to quote Cicero again, but, as he famously remarked to Catalina, ‘Quo usque tandem abutere, Catalina, patientia nostra?’”

1. I didn’t call it progress. I called it inevitable.

2. Never hate quoting Cicero.

3. What does “F u sa so” mean?

4. Take God seriously. Not men, mankind, or culture. They pass.


83 posted on 06/05/2010 10:28:19 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg

Commas, will, get, you, everytime.


84 posted on 06/05/2010 10:29:11 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Yes, as with cheap, pink wine, in a box, it’s easy to go overboard with commas.


85 posted on 06/05/2010 10:43:37 AM PDT by Tax-chick (The Internet. It makes me laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
1. Inevitable? Agreed. But let us not seek, nor legitimise, change for the sake of change.

2. OK.

3. "F u sa so" equals, in illiterate mode, "If you say so"

4. Quite reasonable.

86 posted on 06/05/2010 10:55:48 AM PDT by SAJ (Zerobama? A phony and a prick, ergo a dildo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
making kiddies feel badly about themselves

I'm more and more convinced that this repugnant practice is more harmful than anyone thinks. It doesn't improve self-esteem, whatever that is, it fails to instill humility. Moreover, you can't serve children a sh1t sandwich and tell'em it's chocolate. So, what they learn is that adults are idiots. This leads to cockiness, smart mouths, and that pathetic sense that they know more than anyone else when in reality they are callow and ignorant.

87 posted on 06/05/2010 11:28:11 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Meh, soccer. ItÂ’s just commie kickball.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Won’t argue with your assertions. It also makes them pretty dependent on steady positive feedback which, at least in my case, is pretty sparse in the adult world. That’s a recipe for mass depression in young adults.


88 posted on 06/05/2010 11:30:42 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeSaden

It was a joke.


89 posted on 06/06/2010 10:14:18 PM PDT by paristwelve (Feeling sorry for things is just an excuse for not celebrating your own happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: paristwelve
It was a joke.

Yes I know. And it's an old joke, plagiarized from Mark Twain.

90 posted on 06/07/2010 9:44:38 AM PDT by GeorgeSaden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeSaden

I don’t know the reference. What is it?


91 posted on 06/09/2010 4:51:07 AM PDT by paristwelve (Feeling sorry for things is just an excuse for not celebrating your own happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson