Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Update and longer article on Wired:

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/06/concorde-may-fly-again/

1 posted on 06/03/2010 8:38:09 PM PDT by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mgstarr
Let's get THIS one back in the air!

2 posted on 06/03/2010 8:44:01 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
Maybe we can arrange a Space Shuttle flyover for the 2022 Detroit Olympics!


3 posted on 06/03/2010 8:46:32 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

It was an aircraft killed by cheap tickets. When prices were still silly in the 1960s and 1970s...it would have fallen into the might-make-profit category. By the 1980s...with so much in cheap tickets starting...it was only the ultra rich that would have ever used it.

Now, it requires a ton of maintenance to operate each and every flight...so after the Paris flight episode...it was silly to keep running the few left.


4 posted on 06/03/2010 8:46:33 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
View Image
5 posted on 06/03/2010 8:47:55 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
The article that you linked to had another link to an article I found fascinating. It may be found here. Essentially, it says that the original 707 traveled almost 150 mph faster than what the modern passenger jet flies. We're getting slower, not faster. That's irritating.

One of the few regrets I have in life is that I never had the opportunity to fly the Concord, and by "opportunity", I mean I couldn't afford it.

7 posted on 06/03/2010 8:48:29 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

Bringing it back for a fly over of the Olympics? Why? Or is the dream that if it flies over the Olympics, that somehow some mysterious demand will suddenly crop up to get on a flying death trap of a plane that should have been retired from service in the 1980’s?

Just design a better plane and get it over with.


9 posted on 06/03/2010 8:50:19 PM PDT by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

10 posted on 06/03/2010 8:52:11 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

I’ll let others fly on the Concorde, thanks.


15 posted on 06/03/2010 8:57:54 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

It would take that much time to make one previously-serviced aircraft airworthy again?


17 posted on 06/03/2010 9:00:18 PM PDT by wastedyears (The Founders revolted for less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

One of the loudest planes ever...


40 posted on 06/03/2010 10:30:37 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson