The employer should have known not to give that as a reason, even if it was why they canned her.
PS I confess to total ignorance, and probably idiocy as well. what does “guilty” and “not guilty” mean in this context? I see it frequently but don’t know the details. thanks in advance to anyone who pulls me out of the depths of ignorance.
It all comes from female teachers having sex with their students.
If she’s hot.. then she’s not guilty. For you really can’t convict a hot chick. Cause the student must have really liked it.
If she’s ugly.. then there’s a chance the student probably didn’t like it or was coerced in some way. So.. we say she is guilty.
Now it has just turned into.. hot chicks are not guilty. While the uggers are guilty.
Take a look at this article: http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-06-01/news/is-this-woman-too-hot-to-work-in-a-bank/2 ... the bank telling her she was too hot was not a single occurrence.